R&D productivity for science, technology and innovation policy development in Nigeria: A scientometric analysis of academic literature

被引:6
作者
Abodunde, Olufikayo [1 ,3 ]
Jegede, Oluseye [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Polytech, Acad Planning Unit, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Informat & Knowledge Management, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Obafemi Awolowo Univ, African Inst Sci Policy & Innovat, Ife, Nigeria
关键词
STI policy; research outputs; researchers; thematic areas; collaboration; productivity; scientometrics; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR;
D O I
10.1080/20421338.2020.1718364
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study purposively selected 148 Science and Engineering Journals out of the 221 Journals registered on the African Journal Online (AJOL) directory. Data harvested were analyzed on a year-wise basis from 2012 to 2016, to identify the positive or negative growth trend of research output. The open source software "Publish or Perish" was used to query metrical data for the purposively selected journals by accessing the Google scholar database over the internet. Data were obtained to determine the degree of collaboration based on the 19 thematic areas as identified in the Nigerian Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policy document. It was further examined by measuring the authorship pattern and co-authorship index (CAI). The analysis from the study provides information on the productivity of research that has been carried out in the various thematic areas in Nigerian Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) policy. It also provides information on the nature and extent of collaboration of research among the actors in the research and development system. It thus serves as a reference tool for policymakers to review science, technology and innovation policy in Nigeria.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 795
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, UNESCO Science Report
  • [2] Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government-university-industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France
    Carayannis, EG
    Alexander, J
    Ioannidis, A
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2000, 20 (09) : 477 - 488
  • [3] Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    Pitsouni, Eleni I.
    Malietzis, George A.
    Pappas, Georgios
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (02) : 338 - 342
  • [4] Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past
    Freeman, Christopher
    Soete, Luc
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (04) : 583 - 589
  • [5] Influence of eco-innovation on Indian manufacturing sector sustainable performance
    Ganapathy, Satish Pandian
    Natarajan, Jawahar
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    Subramanian, Nachiappan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 198 - 209
  • [6] Journal impact measures in bibliometric research
    Glanzel, W
    Moed, HF
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) : 171 - 193
  • [7] Harzing A.W, 2019, Publish or Perish
  • [8] An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
    Hirsch, JE
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) : 16569 - 16572
  • [9] Measures for measures
    Lehmann, Sune
    Jackson, Andrew D.
    Lautrup, Benny E.
    [J]. NATURE, 2006, 444 (7122) : 1003 - 1004
  • [10] Malin S., 2003, TEXAS INTELL PROP LA, V12, P473