Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part II: Attribution to Changes in Cloud Amount, Altitude, and Optical Depth

被引:196
作者
Zelinka, Mark D. [1 ,2 ]
Klein, Stephen A. [1 ]
Hartmann, Dennis L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Program Climate Model Diag & Intercomparison, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; LIQUID WATER FEEDBACK; CLIMATE FEEDBACKS; STORM TRACKS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; TROPICAL CLOUD; THICKNESS; SENSITIVITY; MODEL; GCM;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00249.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Cloud radiative kernels and histograms of cloud fraction, both as functions of cloud-top pressure and optical depth, are used to quantify cloud amount, altitude, and optical depth feedbacks. The analysis is applied to doubled-CO2 simulations from 11 global climate models in the Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project. Global, annual, and ensemble mean longwave (LW) and shortwave (SW) cloud feedbacks are positive, with the latter nearly twice as large as the former. The robust increase in cloud-top altitude in both the tropics and extratropics is the dominant contributor to the positive LW cloud feedback. The negative impact of reductions in cloud amount offsets more than half of the positive impact of rising clouds on LW cloud feedback, but the magnitude of compensation varies considerably across the models. In contrast, robust reductions in cloud amount make a large and virtually unopposed positive contribution to SW cloud feedback, though the intermodel spread is greater than for any other individual feedback component. Overall reductions in cloud amount have twice as large an impact on SW fluxes as on LW fluxes, such that the net cloud amount feedback is moderately positive, with no models exhibiting a negative value. As a consequence of large but partially offsetting effects of cloud amount reductions on LW and SW feedbacks, both the mean and intermodel spread in net cloud amount feedback are smaller than those of the net cloud altitude feedback. Finally, the study finds that the large negative cloud feedback at high latitudes results from robust increases in cloud optical depth, not from increases in total cloud amount as is commonly assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:3736 / 3754
页数:19
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] THERMODYNAMIC CONSTRAINT ON THE CLOUD LIQUID WATER FEEDBACK IN CLIMATE MODELS
    BETTS, AK
    HARSHVARDHAN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1987, 92 (D7): : 8483 - 8485
  • [2] On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes
    Bony, S
    Dufresne, JL
    Le Treut, H
    Morcrette, JJ
    Senior, C
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2004, 22 (2-3) : 71 - 86
  • [3] Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models
    Bony, S
    Dufresne, JL
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2005, 32 (20) : 1 - 4
  • [4] How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?
    Bony, Sandrine
    Colman, Robert
    Kattsov, Vladimir M.
    Allan, Richard P.
    Bretherton, Christopher S.
    Dufresne, Jean-Louis
    Hall, Alex
    Hallegatte, Stephane
    Holland, Marika M.
    Ingram, William
    Randall, David A.
    Soden, Brian J.
    Tselioudis, George
    Webb, Mark J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (15) : 3445 - 3482
  • [5] RADIATIVE-TRANSFER DUE TO ATMOSPHERIC WATER-VAPOR - GLOBAL CONSIDERATIONS OF EARTHS ENERGY-BALANCE
    CESS, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 1974, 14 (09) : 861 - 871
  • [6] CESS RD, 1975, TELLUS, V27, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1975.tb01672.x
  • [7] INTERPRETATION OF CLOUD-CLIMATE FEEDBACK AS PRODUCED BY 14 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
    CESS, RD
    POTTER, GL
    BLANCHET, JP
    BOER, GJ
    GHAN, SJ
    KIEHL, JT
    LETREUT, H
    LI, ZX
    LIANG, XZ
    MITCHELL, JFB
    MORCRETTE, JJ
    RANDALL, DA
    RICHES, MR
    ROECKNER, E
    SCHLESE, U
    SLINGO, A
    TAYLOR, KE
    WASHINGTON, WM
    WETHERALD, RT
    YAGAI, I
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4917) : 513 - 516
  • [8] INTERCOMPARISON AND INTERPRETATION OF CLIMATE FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN 19 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
    CESS, RD
    POTTER, GL
    BLANCHET, JP
    BOER, GJ
    DELGENIO, AD
    DEQUE, M
    DYMNIKOV, V
    GALIN, V
    GATES, WL
    GHAN, SJ
    KIEHL, JT
    LACIS, AA
    LETREUT, H
    LI, ZX
    LIANG, XZ
    MCAVANEY, BJ
    MELESHKO, VP
    MITCHELL, JFB
    MORCRETTE, JJ
    RANDALL, DA
    RIKUS, L
    ROECKNER, E
    ROYER, JF
    SCHLESE, U
    SHEININ, DA
    SLINGO, A
    SOKOLOV, AP
    TAYLOR, KE
    WASHINGTON, WM
    WETHERALD, RT
    YAGAI, I
    ZHANG, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D10) : 16601 - 16615
  • [9] Relationships between marine stratus cloud optical depth and temperature: Inferences from AVHRR observations
    Chang, Fu-Lung
    Coakley, James A., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2007, 20 (10) : 2022 - 2036
  • [10] Climate feedbacks in a general circulation model incorporating prognostic clouds
    Colman, R
    Fraser, J
    Rotstayn, L
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2001, 18 (1-2) : 103 - 122