Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation

被引:249
作者
Liang, Liang [2 ]
Wu, Jie [2 ]
Cook, Wade D. [3 ]
Zhu, Joe [1 ]
机构
[1] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Management, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, An Hui, Peoples R China
[3] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
data envelopment analysis (DEA); cross efficiency;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.12.006
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As an extension to data envelopment analysis (DEA), cross-efficiency evaluation not only provides a ranking among the decision-making units (DMUs) but also eliminates unrealistic DEA weighting schemes without requiring a priori information on weight restrictions. A factor that possibly reduces the usefulness of the cross-efficiency evaluation method is that the cross-efficiency scores may not be unique due to the presence of alternate optima. As a result, it is recommended that secondary goals be introduced in cross-efficiency evaluation. This paper seeks to extend the model of Doyle and Green [1994. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and the uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45 (5), 567-578], by introducing a number of different secondary objective functions. The models are illustrated with examples. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1030
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model [J].
Anderson, TR ;
Hollingsworth, K ;
Inman, L .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (03) :249-255
[2]   Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis [J].
Beasley, JE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (01) :198-216
[3]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[4]  
Despotis DK, 2002, J OPER RES SOC, V53, P314, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601253
[5]   EFFICIENCY AND CROSS-EFFICIENCY IN DEA - DERIVATIONS, MEANINGS AND USES [J].
DOYLE, J ;
GREEN, R .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1994, 45 (05) :567-578
[6]   Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation [J].
Green, RH ;
Doyle, JR ;
Cook, WD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 90 (03) :461-472
[7]   Multicriteria decision analysis with minimum information: combining DEA with MAVT [J].
Mavrotas, G ;
Trifillis, P .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (08) :2083-2098
[8]  
NICOLE A, 2002, EUR J OPER RES, V140, P249, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1
[9]   A METHODOLOGY FOR COLLECTIVE EVALUATION AND SELECTION OF INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS [J].
ORAL, M ;
KETTANI, O ;
LANG, P .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 37 (07) :871-885
[10]  
Sexton TR., 1986, NEW DIR PROGRAM EVAL, V32, P73, DOI DOI 10.1002/EV.1441