Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: does age matter?

被引:34
作者
Dogan, Hasan Serkan [1 ]
Kilicarslan, Hakan [1 ]
Kordan, Yakup [1 ]
Celen, Sinan [1 ]
Oktay, Bulent [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Dept Urol, Fac Med, TR-16059 Bursa, Gorukle, Turkey
关键词
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Stone; Treatment; Pediatric; Children; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; DEVELOPING-COUNTRY; PRONE POSITION; RENAL-CALCULI; MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; LITHOTRIPSY; EXPERIENCE; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-011-0692-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To compare the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in 2 age groups. Fifty-one renal units (RU) of 45 patients were operated between January 2006 and December 2010. In all patients, PCNL was performed by pediatric nephroscope of 17F size through a 20F Amplatz sheath. Patients were examined in 2 groups (Group1: a parts per thousand currency sign5 years, Group 2: > 5 years) and outcomes were compared accordingly. The mean age was 5.95 +/- A 3.63 years and male-to-female ratio was 23/22. The mean stone burden, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay were 4.24 +/- A 2.03 cm(2), 94.30 +/- A 37.28 min, and 5.18 +/- A 2.97 days, respectively. In the postoperative period, 44 renal units (86.2%) were stone-free. Two age groups were similar regarding the postoperative hospital stay, gender distribution, stone location, stone composition, and complication rates. However, stone burden and number of access was less and stone-free rate was higher in younger age group. The stone-free rate in preschool children is at least as good as older children without an increase in complication rates. The older children (> 5 years) have a higher stone burden and need multiple accesses more frequently. The complications are mostly low grade and can be managed conservatively. Our results showed that PCNL in younger children as safe and effective as in the older children and age should not be considered as a limiting factor.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 729
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Outcome of small residual stone fragments following shock wave lithotripsy in children [J].
Afshar, K ;
McLorie, G ;
Papanikolaou, F ;
Malek, R ;
Harvey, E ;
Pippi-Salle, JL ;
Bagli, DJ ;
Khoury, AE ;
Farhat, W .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04) :1600-1603
[2]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complete staghorn calculi in preschool children [J].
Aron, M ;
Yadav, R ;
Goel, R ;
Hemal, AK ;
Gupta, NP .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (08) :968-972
[3]   Percutaneous management of renal calculi: Experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 60 children [J].
Badawy, H ;
Salama, A ;
Eissa, M ;
Kotb, E ;
Moro, H ;
Shoukri, I .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) :1710-1713
[4]   Tubeless Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Infants and Preschool Children: A Preliminary Report [J].
Bilen, Cenk Y. ;
Gunay, Mert ;
Ozden, Ender ;
Inci, Kubilay ;
Sarikaya, Saban ;
Tekgul, Serdar .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (06) :2498-2502
[5]  
BILEN CY, J UROL, V177, P1867
[6]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Early and late anatomical and functional results [J].
Dawaba, MS ;
Shokeir, AA ;
Hafez, AT ;
Shoma, AM ;
El-Sherbiny, MT ;
Mokhtar, A ;
Eraky, I ;
El-Kenawy, M ;
El-Kappany, HA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (03) :1078-1081
[7]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric renal calculus disease [J].
Desai, MR ;
Kukreja, RA ;
Patel, SH ;
Bapat, SD .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :23-27
[8]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[9]   Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Study of risk factors [J].
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
Shokeir, Ahmed A. ;
El-Assmy, Ahmed M. ;
Shoma, Ahmed M. ;
Eraky, Ibrahim ;
El-Kenawy, Mahmoud R. ;
El-Kappany, Hamdy A. .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (05) :937-941
[10]   PERCUTANEOUS PYELOLITHOTOMY - NEW EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE [J].
FERNSTROM, I ;
JOHANSSON, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1976, 10 (03) :257-259