Population pharmacokinetics of rucaparib in patients with advanced ovarian cancer or other solid tumors

被引:7
|
作者
Green, Michelle L. [1 ]
Ma, Shu Chin [1 ]
Goble, Sandra [2 ]
Giordano, Heidi [2 ]
Maloney, Lara [2 ]
Simmons, Andrew D. [2 ]
Beltman, Jeri [2 ]
Harding, Thomas C. [2 ]
Xiao, Jim J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Certara Strateg Consulting, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[2] Clovis Oncol Inc, 5500 Flatiron Pkwy, Boulder, CO 80301 USA
关键词
Rucaparib; Population pharmacokinetics; Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor; Solid tumors; POLY(ADP-RIBOSE) POLYMERASE INHIBITOR; PHASE-I; CARCINOMA; COMBINATION; AG014699; PARP; PSN;
D O I
10.1007/s00280-022-04413-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To develop a population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model for rucaparib, an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Methods The PPK analysis used PK data from patients in Study 1014 (NCT01009190, n = 35), Study 10 (NCT01482715, n = 123), and ARIEL2 (NCT01891344, n = 300), including intensive intravenous data (12-40 mg), intensive and sparse oral data (12-360 mg single-dose, 40-500 mg once daily, and 240-840 mg twice daily [BID]), and intensive single-dose oral data under fasted conditions and after a high-fat meal (40, 300, and 600 mg). Results Rucaparib PK was well described by a two-compartment model with sequential zero-order release and first-order absorption and first-order elimination. A high-fat meal slightly increased bioavailability at 600 mg but not at lower doses; this is not considered clinically significant, and rucaparib can be taken with or without food. Covariate effects of baseline creatinine clearance and albumin on rucaparib clearance were identified. Despite numerical increases in exposure with renal impairment, no dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. No statistically significant relationships were detected for demographics, hepatic function (normal versus mild impairment), CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 phenotypes, or strong CYP1A2 or CYP2D6 inhibitors. Concomitant proton pump inhibitors showed no clinically significant effect on absorption. External validation of the model with data from ARIEL3 (NCT01968213) and TRITON2 (NCT02952534) studies showed no clinically meaningful PK differences across indications or sex. Conclusion The PPK model adequately described rucaparib PK, and none of the covariates evaluated had a clinically relevant effect. ClinicalTrials.gov Study 1014 (NCT01009190), Study 10 (NCT01482715), ARIEL2 (NCT01891344), ARIEL3 (NCT01968213), and TRITON2 (NCT02952534).
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 682
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population pharmacokinetics of rucaparib in patients with advanced ovarian cancer or other solid tumors
    Michelle L. Green
    Shu Chin Ma
    Sandra Goble
    Heidi Giordano
    Lara Maloney
    Andrew D. Simmons
    Jeri Beltman
    Thomas C. Harding
    Jim J. Xiao
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2022, 89 : 671 - 682
  • [2] Pharmacokinetics and safety of rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic impairment
    Grechko, Nikolay
    Skarbova, Viera
    Tomaszewska-Kiecana, Monika
    Ramlau, Rodryg
    Centkowski, Piotr
    Drew, Yvette
    Dziadziuszko, Rafal
    Zemanova, Milada
    Beltman, Jeri
    Nash, Eileen
    Habeck, Jenn
    Liao, Mingxiang
    Xiao, Jim
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 88 (02) : 259 - 270
  • [3] Pharmacokinetic Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
    Shapiro, Geoffrey, I
    Kristeleit, Rebecca S.
    Burris, Howard A.
    LoRusso, Patricia
    Patel, Manish R.
    Drew, Yvette
    Giordano, Heidi
    Maloney, Lara
    Watkins, Simon
    Goble, Sandra
    Jaw-Tsai, Sarah
    Xiao, Jim J.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 8 (01): : 107 - 118
  • [4] Pharmacokinetics and safety of rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic impairment
    Nikolay Grechko
    Viera Skarbova
    Monika Tomaszewska-Kiecana
    Rodryg Ramlau
    Piotr Centkowski
    Yvette Drew
    Rafal Dziadziuszko
    Milada Zemanova
    Jeri Beltman
    Eileen Nash
    Jenn Habeck
    Mingxiang Liao
    Jim Xiao
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2021, 88 : 259 - 270
  • [5] Population pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors
    Géraldine M. Ferron
    Yang Dai
    Dorothée Semiond
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2013, 71 : 681 - 692
  • [6] Population pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors
    Ferron, Geraldine M.
    Dai, Yang
    Semiond, Dorothee
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 71 (03) : 681 - 692
  • [7] Population pharmacokinetics modeling and analysis of foretinib in adult patients with advanced solid tumors
    Singh, Rajendra P.
    Patel, Bela
    Kallender, Howard
    Ottesen, Lone H.
    Adams, Laurel M.
    Cox, Donna S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 55 (10) : 1184 - 1192
  • [8] Population Pharmacokinetics of Z-Endoxifen in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
    Koubek, Emily J.
    Ralya, Andrew T.
    Larson, Thomas R.
    McGovern, Renee M.
    Buhrow, Sarah A.
    Covey, Joseph M.
    Adjei, Alex A.
    Takebe, Naoko
    Ames, Matthew M.
    Goetz, Matthew P.
    Reid, Joel M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 62 (09) : 1121 - 1131
  • [9] Population Pharmacokinetics of Glasdegib in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies and Solid Tumors
    Lin, Swan
    Shaik, Naveed
    Martinelli, Giovanni
    Wagner, Andrew J.
    Cortes, Jorge
    Ruiz-Garcia, Ana
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 60 (05) : 605 - 616
  • [10] Targeted treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: spotlight on rucaparib
    Pearre, Diana C.
    Tewari, Krishnansu S.
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 : 2189 - 2201