The Politics of Technology Decline: Discursive Struggles over Coal Phase-Out in the UK(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras Clave

被引:48
作者
Isoaho, Karoliina [1 ]
Markard, Jochen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Management Technol & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
technology decline; regime destabilization; resistance; actors; sustainability; energy transition; discourse analysis; policy change; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIOTECHNICAL-TRANSITIONS; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; REGIME DESTABILIZATION; ELECTRICITY; GERMAN; POLICY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12370
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The decline of carbon intensive technologies is a key element in the ongoing energy transition and our attempts to tackle climate change. At the same time, our understanding of technology decline and of the associated policies and politics is still limited. This paper builds on the sustainability transitions perspective, a novel approach to analyze socio-technical transformation, including the complex interplay of policy and technology change. We study the decline of coal-fired power generation in the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2017 by analyzing the discourse inThe Guardian. We find scientists and environmental NGOs criticizing coal for climate and health reasons. Government and incumbent businesses tried to re-legitimate coal but eventually, their resistance collapsed and coal was almost completely abandoned in just a few years. Particularly devastating for coal were failed promises around carbon capture and storage, rapid diffusion of wind energy, and pressure from various policies. This study contributes to better understanding the contested nature of decline, and the interplay of discursive struggles, technology change, and public policy in sustainability transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 368
页数:27
相关论文
共 80 条
[61]   Momentum is increasing towards a flexible electricity system based on renewables [J].
Mitchell, Catherine .
NATURE ENERGY, 2016, 1
[62]   Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study [J].
Penna, Caetano C. R. ;
Geels, Frank W. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (06) :999-1020
[63]   The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda [J].
Roberts, Cameron ;
Geels, Frank W. ;
Lockwood, Matthew ;
Newell, Peter ;
Schmitz, Hubert ;
Turnheim, Bruno ;
Jordan, Andy .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 44 :304-311
[65]   Critical choices and the politics of decarbonization pathways: Exploring branching points surrounding low-carbon transitions in Canadian electricity systems [J].
Rosenbloom, Daniel ;
Haley, Brendan ;
Meadowcroft, James .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 37 :22-36
[66]   Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada [J].
Rosenbloom, Daniel ;
Berton, Harris ;
Meadowcroft, James .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (06) :1275-1290
[67]   Institutional work and climate change: Corporate political action in the Swedish electricity industry [J].
Sarasini, Steven .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 56 :480-489
[68]   Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics [J].
Schmidt, Tobias S. ;
Sewerin, Sebastian .
NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (06)
[69]   Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents' institutional strategies [J].
Smink, Magda M. ;
Hekkert, Marko P. ;
Negro, Simona O. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 24 (02) :86-101
[70]  
Stegmaier P., 2014, GOVERNANCE SOCIOTECH, P111, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781784710194.00015