The Politics of Technology Decline: Discursive Struggles over Coal Phase-Out in the UK(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras Clave

被引:48
作者
Isoaho, Karoliina [1 ]
Markard, Jochen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Management Technol & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
technology decline; regime destabilization; resistance; actors; sustainability; energy transition; discourse analysis; policy change; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIOTECHNICAL-TRANSITIONS; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; REGIME DESTABILIZATION; ELECTRICITY; GERMAN; POLICY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12370
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The decline of carbon intensive technologies is a key element in the ongoing energy transition and our attempts to tackle climate change. At the same time, our understanding of technology decline and of the associated policies and politics is still limited. This paper builds on the sustainability transitions perspective, a novel approach to analyze socio-technical transformation, including the complex interplay of policy and technology change. We study the decline of coal-fired power generation in the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2017 by analyzing the discourse inThe Guardian. We find scientists and environmental NGOs criticizing coal for climate and health reasons. Government and incumbent businesses tried to re-legitimate coal but eventually, their resistance collapsed and coal was almost completely abandoned in just a few years. Particularly devastating for coal were failed promises around carbon capture and storage, rapid diffusion of wind energy, and pressure from various policies. This study contributes to better understanding the contested nature of decline, and the interplay of discursive struggles, technology change, and public policy in sustainability transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 368
页数:27
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [51] Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK
    Lovell, Heather
    Bulkeley, Harriet
    Owens, Susan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2009, 27 (01): : 90 - 109
  • [52] The life cycle of technological innovation systems
    Markard, Jochen
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 153
  • [53] The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy
    Markard, Jochen
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (08): : 628 - 633
  • [54] Analysis of complementarities: Framework and examples from the energy transition
    Markard, Jochen
    Hoffmann, Volker H.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 111 : 63 - 75
  • [55] Socio-technical transitions and policy change - Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy
    Markard, Jochen
    Suter, Marco
    Ingold, Karin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2016, 18 : 215 - 237
  • [56] Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
    Markard, Jochen
    Raven, Rob
    Truffer, Bernhard
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (06) : 955 - 967
  • [57] Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: Analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system (1990-2016)
    McMeekin, Andrew
    Geels, Frank W.
    Hodson, Mike
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (05) : 1216 - 1231
  • [58] Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions
    Meadowcroft, James
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2011, 1 (01) : 70 - 75
  • [59] Policy sequencing toward decarbonization
    Meckling, Jonas
    Sterner, Thomas
    Wagner, Gernot
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (12): : 918 - 922
  • [60] The Globalization of Carbon Trading: Transnational Business Coalitions in Climate Politics
    Meckling, Jonas
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2011, 11 (02) : 26 - +