The Politics of Technology Decline: Discursive Struggles over Coal Phase-Out in the UK(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras Clave

被引:49
作者
Isoaho, Karoliina [1 ]
Markard, Jochen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Management Technol & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
technology decline; regime destabilization; resistance; actors; sustainability; energy transition; discourse analysis; policy change; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIOTECHNICAL-TRANSITIONS; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; REGIME DESTABILIZATION; ELECTRICITY; GERMAN; POLICY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12370
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The decline of carbon intensive technologies is a key element in the ongoing energy transition and our attempts to tackle climate change. At the same time, our understanding of technology decline and of the associated policies and politics is still limited. This paper builds on the sustainability transitions perspective, a novel approach to analyze socio-technical transformation, including the complex interplay of policy and technology change. We study the decline of coal-fired power generation in the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2017 by analyzing the discourse inThe Guardian. We find scientists and environmental NGOs criticizing coal for climate and health reasons. Government and incumbent businesses tried to re-legitimate coal but eventually, their resistance collapsed and coal was almost completely abandoned in just a few years. Particularly devastating for coal were failed promises around carbon capture and storage, rapid diffusion of wind energy, and pressure from various policies. This study contributes to better understanding the contested nature of decline, and the interplay of discursive struggles, technology change, and public policy in sustainability transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 368
页数:27
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, IND ASS UKS CLEAN GR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, GERMANYS ENERGY TRAN
  • [3] [Anonymous], EM GAP REP 2016
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, Under pressure
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2019, THEORIES POLICY PROC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, Journal of Environmental Policy Planning, DOI [10.1080/15239080500339646, DOI 10.1080/15239080500339646]
  • [7] Benton D., 2015, DECARBONISING BRIT I
  • [8] . Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition
    Bosman, Rick
    Loorbach, Derk
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Pistorius, Till
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2014, 13 : 45 - 59
  • [9] Boykoff M., 2011, MAKING SENSE MEDIA R
  • [10] Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change
    Brueggemann, Michael
    Engesser, Sven
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 42 : 58 - 67