Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens?

被引:542
作者
DiPasquale, D [1 ]
Glaeser, EL
机构
[1] City Res, Boston, MA 02110 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/juec.1998.2098
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Homeownership may encourage investment in local amenities and social capital, because homeownership gives individuals an incentive to improve their community and because homeownership creates barriers to mobility. Using the U.S. General Social Survey, we document that homeowners invest more in social capital; a simple instrumental variables strategy suggests that the relationship may be causal. We also find evidence that a large portion of the effect of homeownership on these investments comes from lower mobility rates for homeowners. Using the German Socio-Economic Panel, we find a connection between homeownership and citizenship controlling for individual fixed effects. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 384
页数:31
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
DIAMOND D, 1992, J HOUSING RES, V3, P79
[2]   MOBILITY AND REDISTRIBUTION [J].
EPPLE, D ;
ROMER, T .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (04) :828-858
[3]  
GLAESER E, 1997, UNPUB DEMAND RELIG
[4]   Measuring the benefits of homeowning: Effects on children [J].
Green, RK ;
White, MJ .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1997, 41 (03) :441-461
[5]  
Hall R. E., 1995, FLAT TAX
[6]  
Jorgenson DW, 1997, AM ECON REV, V87, P126
[7]   Crime, deterrence, and right-to-carry concealed handguns [J].
Lott, JR ;
Mustard, DB .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1997, 26 (01) :1-68
[8]  
Loury G.C, 1976, A dynamic theory of racial income differences
[9]  
OSWALD A, 1997, UNPUB CONJECTURE E 1
[10]  
POTERBA J, 1996, NBER WORKING PAPER, V5550