Deciphering the impact of uncertainty on the accuracy of large wildfire spread simulations

被引:44
作者
Benali, Akli [1 ]
Ervilha, Ana R. [2 ]
Sa, Ana C. L. [1 ]
Fernandes, Paulo M. [3 ]
Pinto, Renata M. S. [1 ]
Trigo, Ricardo M. [4 ]
Pereira, Jose M. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Agron, Ctr Estudos Florestais, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Dept Engn Mecan, Inst Super Tecn, LAETA,IDMEC,LASEF, Ave Rovisco Pais,1, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroambientais & Biol, Quinta De Prados, Vila Real, Portugal
[4] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Inst Dom Luis, Campo Grande Edificio C8,Piso 3, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Spatial discrepancy; Satellite; FARSITE; MODIS; Fire behavior; Hotspots; FIRE BEHAVIOR; MODEL; FUEL; RISK; PROPAGATION; PREDICTIONS; ALGORITHM; PORTUGAL; PRODUCT; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Predicting wildfire spread is a challenging task fraught with uncertainties. 'Perfect' predictions are unfeasible since uncertainties will always be present. Improving fire spread predictions is important to reduce its negative environmental impacts. Here, we propose to understand, characterize, and quantify the impact of uncertainty in the accuracy of fire spread predictions for very large wildfires. We frame this work from the perspective of the major problems commonly faced by fire model users, namely the necessity of accounting for uncertainty in input data to produce reliable and useful fire spread predictions. Uncertainty in input variables was propagated throughout the modeling framework and its impact was evaluated by estimating the spatial discrepancy between simulated and satellite-observed fire progression data, for eight very large wildfires in Portugal. Results showed that uncertainties in wind speed and direction, fuel model assignment and typology, location and timing of ignitions, had a major impact on prediction accuracy. We argue that uncertainties in these variables should be integrated in future fire spread simulation approaches, and provide the necessary data for any fire model user to do so. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 85
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [31] The dynamics and drivers of fuel and fire in the Portuguese public forest
    Fernandes, Paulo M.
    Loureiro, Carlos
    Guiomar, Nuno
    Pezzatti, Gianni B.
    Manso, Filipa T.
    Lopes, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 146 : 373 - 382
  • [32] Ferreira J., 2012, EGU GEN ASSEMBLY, P22
  • [33] Finney M. A, 2004, Technical Report Research Paper RMRS-RP-4
  • [34] The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire
    Finney, MA
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 211 (1-2) : 97 - 108
  • [35] A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States
    Finney, Mark A.
    McHugh, Charles W.
    Grenfell, Isaac C.
    Riley, Karin L.
    Short, Karen C.
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2011, 25 (07) : 973 - 1000
  • [36] A Method for Ensemble Wildland Fire Simulation
    Finney, Mark A.
    Grenfell, Isaac C.
    McHugh, Charles W.
    Seli, Robert C.
    Trethewey, Diane
    Stratton, Richard D.
    Brittain, Stuart
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (02) : 153 - 167
  • [37] Fisher W. C., 1982, INT96 INT FOR RANG E, P133
  • [38] An enhanced contextual fire detection algorithm for MODIS
    Giglio, L
    Descloitres, J
    Justice, CO
    Kaufman, YJ
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 87 (2-3) : 273 - 282
  • [39] GIGLIO L., 2020, Collection 6 MODIS Burned Area Product User's Guide Version 1.3
  • [40] Gill A., 2001, TRANSDISCIPLINARY VI, P1