Deciphering the impact of uncertainty on the accuracy of large wildfire spread simulations

被引:44
作者
Benali, Akli [1 ]
Ervilha, Ana R. [2 ]
Sa, Ana C. L. [1 ]
Fernandes, Paulo M. [3 ]
Pinto, Renata M. S. [1 ]
Trigo, Ricardo M. [4 ]
Pereira, Jose M. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Agron, Ctr Estudos Florestais, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Dept Engn Mecan, Inst Super Tecn, LAETA,IDMEC,LASEF, Ave Rovisco Pais,1, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroambientais & Biol, Quinta De Prados, Vila Real, Portugal
[4] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, Inst Dom Luis, Campo Grande Edificio C8,Piso 3, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Spatial discrepancy; Satellite; FARSITE; MODIS; Fire behavior; Hotspots; FIRE BEHAVIOR; MODEL; FUEL; RISK; PROPAGATION; PREDICTIONS; ALGORITHM; PORTUGAL; PRODUCT; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.112
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Predicting wildfire spread is a challenging task fraught with uncertainties. 'Perfect' predictions are unfeasible since uncertainties will always be present. Improving fire spread predictions is important to reduce its negative environmental impacts. Here, we propose to understand, characterize, and quantify the impact of uncertainty in the accuracy of fire spread predictions for very large wildfires. We frame this work from the perspective of the major problems commonly faced by fire model users, namely the necessity of accounting for uncertainty in input data to produce reliable and useful fire spread predictions. Uncertainty in input variables was propagated throughout the modeling framework and its impact was evaluated by estimating the spatial discrepancy between simulated and satellite-observed fire progression data, for eight very large wildfires in Portugal. Results showed that uncertainties in wind speed and direction, fuel model assignment and typology, location and timing of ignitions, had a major impact on prediction accuracy. We argue that uncertainties in these variables should be integrated in future fire spread simulation approaches, and provide the necessary data for any fire model user to do so. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 85
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Albini F. A., 1976, TECH REP
  • [2] Limitations on the accuracy of model predictions of wildland fire behaviour: A state-of-the-knowledge overview
    Alexander, Martin E.
    Cruz, Miguel G.
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2013, 89 (03) : 370 - 381
  • [3] Are the applications of wildland fire behaviour models getting ahead of their evaluation again?
    Alexander, Martin E.
    Cruz, Miguel G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 41 : 65 - 71
  • [4] Mapping lightning/human-caused wildfires occurrence under ignition point location uncertainty
    Amatulli, Giuseppe
    Perez-Cabello, Fernando
    de la Riva, Juan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (3-4) : 321 - 333
  • [5] Anderson H.E., 1982, The Bark Beetles, Fuels, and Fire Bibliography, P143
  • [6] An approach to operational forest fire growth predictions for Canada
    Anderson, K. R.
    Englefield, P.
    Little, J. M.
    Reuter, Gerhard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2009, 18 (08) : 893 - 905
  • [7] Fire-growth modelling using meteorological data with random and systematic perturbations
    Anderson, Kerry
    Reuter, Gerhard
    Flannigan, Mike D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2007, 16 (02) : 174 - 182
  • [8] A generic, empirical-based model for predicting rate of fire spread in shrublands
    Anderson, Wendy R.
    Cruz, Miguel G.
    Fernandes, Paulo M.
    McCaw, Lachlan
    Vega, Jose Antonio
    Bradstock, Ross A.
    Fogarty, Liam
    Gould, Jim
    McCarthy, Greg
    Marsden-Smedley, Jon B.
    Matthews, Stuart
    Mattingley, Greg
    Pearce, H. Grant
    van Wilgen, Brian W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2015, 24 (04) : 443 - 460
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2000, CORINE LAND COVER TE
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1972, MATH MODEL PREDICTIN