Examining Type 1 Diabetes Mathematical Models Using Experimental Data

被引:8
作者
Al Ali, Hannah [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Daneshkhah, Alireza [1 ]
Boutayeb, Abdesslam [4 ]
Mukandavire, Zindoga [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Coventry Univ, Computat Sci & Math Modelling, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[2] Emirates Avit Univ, Inst Appl Res & Technol, Dubai 53044, U Arab Emirates
[3] Emirates Avit Univ, Ctr Data Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Dubai 53044, U Arab Emirates
[4] Univ Mohamed Premier, Fac Sci, Dept Math, POB 524, Oujda 60000, Morocco
关键词
diabetes; thresholds; model selection; model calibration; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION; SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION; INSULIN KINETICS; MINIMAL-MODEL; SENSITIVITY; HOMEOSTASIS; SELECTION; GLARGINE; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19020737
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Type 1 diabetes requires treatment with insulin injections and monitoring glucose levels in affected individuals. We explored the utility of two mathematical models in predicting glucose concentration levels in type 1 diabetic mice and determined disease pathways. We adapted two mathematical models, one with beta-cells and the other with no beta-cell component to determine their capability in predicting glucose concentration and determine type 1 diabetes pathways using published glucose concentration data for four groups of experimental mice. The groups of mice were numbered Mice Group 1-4, depending on the diabetes severity of each group, with severity increasing from group 1-4. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo method based on a Bayesian framework was used to fit the model to determine the best model structure. Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criteria (BIC) approaches were used to assess the best model structure for type 1 diabetes. In fitting the model with no beta-cells to glucose level data, we varied insulin absorption rate and insulin clearance rate. However, the model with beta-cells required more parameters to match the data and we fitted the beta-cell glucose tolerance factor, whole body insulin clearance rate, glucose production rate, and glucose clearance rate. Fitting the models to the blood glucose concentration level gave the least difference in AIC of 1.2, and a difference in BIC of 0.12 for Mice Group 4. The estimated AIC and BIC values were highest for Mice Group 1 than all other mice groups. The models gave substantial differences in AIC and BIC values for Mice Groups 1-3 ranging from 2.10 to 4.05. Our results suggest that the model without beta-cells provides a more suitable structure for modelling type 1 diabetes and predicting blood glucose concentration for hypoglycaemic episodes.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   The impact of mathematical modeling on the understanding of diabetes and related complications [J].
Ajmera, I. ;
Swat, M. ;
Laibe, C. ;
Le Novere, N. ;
Chelliah, V. .
CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 2 (07)
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
Al Ali H., EXPLORING DYNAMICAL
[4]  
Aradóttir TB, 2018, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P2354, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512792
[5]   Adaptive fuzzy integral sliding mode control of blood glucose level in patients with type 1 diabetes: In silico studies [J].
Asadi, Sh. ;
Nekoukar, V. .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2018, 305 :122-132
[6]   QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
IDER, YZ ;
BOWDEN, CR ;
COBELLI, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 236 (06) :E667-E677
[7]   TOWARD PHYSIOLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING OF GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE - MINIMAL-MODEL APPROACH [J].
BERGMAN, RN .
DIABETES, 1989, 38 (12) :1512-1527
[8]   PHYSIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF FACTORS CONTROLLING GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE IN MAN - MEASUREMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY AND BETA-CELL GLUCOSE SENSITIVITY FROM THE RESPONSE TO INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
PHILLIPS, LS ;
COBELLI, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1981, 68 (06) :1456-1467
[9]   COEFFICIENTS OF NORMAL BLOOD GLUCOSE REGULATION [J].
BOLIE, VW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1961, 16 (05) :783-&
[10]  
Boutayeb W., 2014, Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, V7, P330, DOI 10.4236/jbise.2014.76035