A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process of couples considering prenatal screening for Down syndrome

被引:22
作者
Carroll, Fran E. [1 ]
Owen-Smith, Amanda [1 ]
Shaw, Alison [1 ]
Montgomery, Alan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
maternal serum screening; psychosocial; fetal ultrasound; Down syndrome; decision making; OSCAR; INFORMED CHOICE; WOMEN; AMNIOCENTESIS; INFORMATION; CONTEXT; EXPERIENCES; PARENTS; NEEDS; CARE; MEN;
D O I
10.1002/pd.2901
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to investigate how couples regard screening information and how they make subsequent decisions about undergoing prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Methods Twenty semi structured interviews were conducted to explore aspects of the decision making process. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed using the framework approach. Results Couples reported a strong desire for a joint but ultimately private decision making process and saw the main role of their midwife as an information provider. Considerable confusion existed over which screening tests were available via the National Health Service and which were offered privately. Provision of experiential information regarding both subsequent diagnostic tests and the experience of living with Down syndrome would have been beneficial. Conclusion This study shows that couples would benefit from receiving experiential information when they are deciding about Down syndrome screening. Future research should be conducted to establish what form such information should take, the most helpful means to provide such information, and whether such information would also be useful in other contexts where people need to make decisions whether to undergo screening. (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] 'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource
    Ahmed, Shenaz
    Bryant, Louise
    Hewison, Jenny
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2007, 10 (04) : 309 - 320
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, ATL TI 5 0
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, NHS CHOIC
  • [4] Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy
    Asch, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (11) : 1649 - 1657
  • [5] Shared Decision Making: Vision to Reality
    Barry, Michael
    Levin, Carrie
    MacCuaig, Morgan
    Mulley, Al
    Sepucha, Karen
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 : 1 - 5
  • [6] One-stop clinic for assessment of risk for trisomy 21 at 11-14 weeks: a prospective study of 15 030 pregnancies
    Bindra, R
    Heath, V
    Liao, A
    Spencer, K
    Nicolaides, KH
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [7] Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
    Charles, C
    Gafni, A
    Whelan, T
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) : 681 - 692
  • [8] First-trimester screening and its impact on uptake of diagnostic testing
    Darnes, Deanna R.
    Hashmi, Syed
    Monga, Manju
    Sullivan, Cathy
    Vidaeff, Alex
    Berens, Pamela
    Czerwinski, Jennifer L.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (09) : 892 - 896
  • [9] Low uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: a reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choices?
    Dormandy, E
    Michie, S
    Hooper, R
    Marteau, TM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (02) : 346 - 352
  • [10] Durand MA, 2008, AMNIOCENTESIS DECISI