Behavioral Mechanism during Human Sperm Chemotaxis: Involvement of Hyperactivation

被引:50
作者
Armon, Leah [1 ]
Eisenbach, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Biol Chem, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
来源
PLOS ONE | 2011年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
HUMAN-SPERMATOZOA; POSTNATAL-DEVELOPMENT; BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS; INTRACELLULAR CA2+; FOLLICULAR FACTORS; MALE-FERTILITY; MOUSE TESTIS; MOTILITY; PROGESTERONE; CHANNEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0028359
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
When mammalian spermatozoa become capacitated they acquire, among other activities, chemotactic responsiveness and the ability to exhibit occasional events of hyperactivated motility-a vigorous motility type with large amplitudes of head displacement. Although a number of roles have been proposed for this type of motility, its function is still obscure. Here we provide evidence suggesting that hyperactivation is part of the chemotactic response. By analyzing tracks of spermatozoa swimming in a spatial chemoattractant gradient we demonstrate that, in such a gradient, the level of hyperactivation events is significantly lower than in proper controls. This suggests that upon sensing an increase in the chemoattractant concentration capacitated cells repress their hyperactivation events and thus maintain their course of swimming toward the chemoattractant. Furthermore, in response to a temporal concentration jump achieved by photorelease of the chemoattractant progesterone from its caged form, the responsive cells exhibited a delayed turn, often accompanied by hyperactivation events or an even more intense response in the form of flagellar arrest. This study suggests that the function of hyperactivation is to cause a rather sharp turn during the chemotactic response of capacitated cells so as to assist them to reorient according to the chemoattractant gradient. On the basis of these results a model for the behavior of spermatozoa responding to a spatial chemoattractant gradient is proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   CATSPER2, a human autosomal nonsyndromic male infertility gene [J].
Avidan, N ;
Tamary, H ;
Dgany, O ;
Cattan, D ;
Pariente, A ;
Thulliez, M ;
Borot, N ;
Moati, L ;
Barthelme, A ;
Shalmon, L ;
Krasnov, T ;
Asher, EB ;
Olender, T ;
Khen, M ;
Yaniv, I ;
Zaizov, R ;
Shalev, H ;
Delaunay, J ;
Fellous, M ;
Lancet, D ;
Beckmann, JS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 11 (07) :497-502
[2]   Thermotaxis of mammalian sperm cells: A potential navigation mechanism in the female genital tract [J].
Bahat, A ;
Tur-Kaspa, I ;
Gakamsky, A ;
Giojalas, LC ;
Breitbart, H ;
Eisenbach, M .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2003, 9 (02) :149-150
[3]   IMPULSE RESPONSES IN BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS [J].
BLOCK, SM ;
SEGALL, JE ;
BERG, HC .
CELL, 1982, 31 (01) :215-226
[4]   CHARACTERIZATION OF HYPERACTIVATED MOTILITY BY HUMAN-SPERMATOZOA DURING CAPACITATION - COMPARISON OF FERTILE AND OLIGOZOOSPERMIC SPERM POPULATIONS [J].
BURKMAN, LJ .
ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 1984, 13 (2-3) :153-165
[5]   Two Distinct Ca2+ Signaling Pathways Modulate Sperm Flagellar Beating Patterns in Mice [J].
Chang, Haixin ;
Suarez, Susan S. .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2011, 85 (02) :296-305
[6]   SEQUENTIAL ACQUISITION OF CHEMOTACTIC RESPONSIVENESS BY HUMAN SPERMATOZOA [J].
COHENDAYAG, A ;
RALT, D ;
TURKASPA, I ;
MANOR, M ;
MAKLER, A ;
DOR, J ;
MASHIACH, S ;
EISENBACH, M .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1994, 50 (04) :786-790
[7]   SPERM CAPACITATION IN HUMANS IS TRANSIENT AND CORRELATES WITH CHEMOTACTIC RESPONSIVENESS TO FOLLICULAR FACTORS [J].
COHENDAYAG, A ;
TURKASPA, I ;
DOR, J ;
MASHIACH, S ;
EISENBACH, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1995, 92 (24) :11039-11043
[8]   Derivation and reliability of kinematic measures of sperm motion [J].
Davis, RO ;
Siemers, RJ .
REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 1995, 7 (04) :857-868
[9]   Sperm guidance in mammals - an unpaved road to the egg [J].
Eisenbach, M ;
Giojalas, LC .
NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2006, 7 (04) :276-285
[10]   Sperm chemotaxis [J].
Eisenbach, M .
REVIEWS OF REPRODUCTION, 1999, 4 (01) :56-66