Intuitive Use and Usability of Ventricular Assist Device Peripheral Components in Simulated Emergency Conditions

被引:19
作者
Geidl, Lorenz [1 ]
Deckert, Zeno [3 ]
Zrunek, Philipp [3 ,4 ]
Gottardi, Roman [3 ]
Sterz, Fritz [2 ]
Wieselthaler, Georg [3 ,4 ]
Schima, Heinrich [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Emergency Med, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Cardiac Surg, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[4] Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster Cardiovasc Res, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Ventricular assist device; Usability; Emergency condition; Paramedics; User interface; Intuitive use; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01330.x
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are now increasingly used to prolong the lives of end-stage heart failure patients. These patients vary greatly in age, alertness, activity, and home environment. In daily routine, but especially in emergencies or in conjunction with non-VAD-correlated diseases, the untrained, intuitive use and application of VAD peripherals by relatives, laypersons, and paramedics becomes important. Correct intuitive use may be a matter of life and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intuitive usability of these systems and to identify key features needed to optimize intuitive use. Paramedics (n = 96) were confronted with a simulated emergency situation involving VAD peripherals mounted on a dummy. Three conditions were simulated: the VAD disconnected from its power source (n = 44); both VAD batteries empty (n = 44); and a discharged VAD battery mistakenly connected in place of a charged one (n = 8). Two VAD systems were assessed: the Heartware HVAD and the Thoratec HeartMate II. An appropriate emergency card developed by our center was available in each case. Actions were videotaped, response times were measured, and a standardized questionnaire was completed after the simulation. The problem was solved by 71% of the participants (HVAD 83%, HMII 60%) with 87% using the emergency card. Only 4% could solve the problem without. Cardiac massage, which was unnecessary, was started by 44%, while 18% complained about unnecessarily difficult conditions (e. g., irritation from the acoustic alarm, complexity of the emergency card, error-prone procedures). Better component labeling (e. g., displays, control elements, connectors) was recommended by 56%. A thoroughly color-coded connection system was especially desired. Cable- and connector-related difficulties were reported by 23%. The study indicated that VAD systems should be self-explaining, with clear labeling of components and connectors, that a clearer emergency card is pivotal and that similar basic handling and emergency procedures for all VAD types would be desirable.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 780
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 62366 EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 14971 EN ISO
[3]   Usability and Safety of Ventricular Assist Devices: Human Factors and Design Aspects [J].
Geidl, Lorenz ;
Zrunek, Philipp ;
Deckert, Zeno ;
Zimpfer, Daniel ;
Sandner, Sigrid ;
Wieselthaler, Georg ;
Schima, Heinrich .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2009, 33 (09) :691-695
[4]   INTERMACS database for durable devices for circulatory support: First annual report [J].
Kirklin, James K. ;
Naftel, David C. ;
Stevenson, Lynne Warner ;
Kormos, Robert L. ;
Pagani, Francis D. ;
Miller, Marissa A. ;
Ulisney, Karen ;
Young, James B. .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 27 (10) :1065-1072
[5]   Patient Satisfaction With the External Equipment of Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices [J].
Meyer, Anna L. ;
Kugler, Christiane ;
Malehsa, Doris ;
Haverich, Axel ;
Strueber, Martin .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2010, 34 (09) :721-725
[6]   A study comparing the usability of fully automatic versus semi-automatic defibrillation by untrained nursing students [J].
Monsieurs, KG ;
Vogels, C ;
Bossaert, LL ;
Meert, P ;
Calle, PA .
RESUSCITATION, 2005, 64 (01) :41-47
[7]   Extended Mechanical Circulatory Support With a Continuous-Flow Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Device [J].
Pagani, Francis D. ;
Miller, Leslie W. ;
Russell, Stuart D. ;
Aaronson, Keith D. ;
John, Ranjit ;
Boyle, Andrew J. ;
Conte, John V. ;
Bogaev, Roberta C. ;
MacGillivray, Thomas E. ;
Naka, Yoshifumi ;
Mancini, Donna ;
Massey, H. Todd ;
Chen, Leway ;
Klodell, Charles T. ;
Aranda, Juan M. ;
Moazami, Nader ;
Ewald, Gregory A. ;
Farrar, David J. ;
Frazier, O. Howard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (04) :312-321
[8]   Past, Present, and Future Regulatory Aspects of Ventricular Assist Devices [J].
Patel-Raman, Sonna M. ;
Chen, Eric A. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (06) :600-603
[9]   Age and Outcome After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Bridge to Transplantation [J].
Sandner, Sigrid E. ;
Zimpfer, Daniel ;
Zrunek, Philipp ;
Rajek, Angela ;
Schima, Heinrich ;
Dunkler, Daniela ;
Zuckermann, Andreas O. ;
Wieselthaler, Georg M. .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 28 (04) :367-372
[10]  
Schima H, 2006, INT J ARTIF ORGANS, V29, P505