Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer

被引:5
作者
Chowdappa, Ramachandra [1 ]
Dharanikota, Anvesh [1 ]
Arjunan, Ravi [1 ]
Althaf, Syed [1 ]
Premalata, Chennagiri S. [2 ]
Ranganath, Namrata [3 ]
机构
[1] Kidwai Mem Inst Oncol, Dept Surg Oncol, Dr MH Marigowda Rd, Bangalore 560029, Karnataka, India
[2] Kidwai Mem Inst Oncol, Dept Pathol, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[3] Kidwai Mem Inst Oncol, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Relief, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
minimally invasive esophagectomy; open esophagectomy; operative outcomes; pulmonary complications; esophageal cancer; ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RESECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1730085
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) could reduce the pulmonary complications and reduce the postoperative stay. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 114 patients with esophageal cancer in the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary cancer center in South India between January 2019 and March 2020. We included patients with resectable cancer of middle or lower third of the esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I). MIE was performed in 27 patients and 78 patients underwent open esophagectomy (OE). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days. Other outcomes measured include overall mortality within 30 days, intraoperative complications, operative duration and the length of hospital stay. Results A postoperative complication rate of 18.5% was noted in the MIE group, compared with 41% in the OE group ( p = 0.034). Pulmonary complications were noted in 7.4% in the MIE group compared to 25.6% in the OE group ( p = 0.044). Postoperative mortality rates, intraoperative complications, and other nonpulmonary postoperative complications were almost similar with MIE as with open esophagectomy. Although the median operative time was more in the MIE group (260 minutes vs. 180 minutes; p < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing MIE (9 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.0001). Conclusions We found that MIE resulted in lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications. Although, MIE was associated with prolonged operative duration, it resulted in shorter hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 235
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Maas, Kirsten W. ;
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Roig Garcia, Josep ;
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. ;
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. ;
Hollmann, Markus W. ;
de lange, Elly S. M. ;
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
van der Peet, Donald L. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) :1887-1892
[2]   Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial) [J].
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;
Maas, Kirsten W. ;
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Roig Garcia, Josep ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Sosef, Meindert N. ;
de lange, Elly S. M. ;
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
van der Peet, Donald L. .
BMC SURGERY, 2011, 11
[3]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[4]   Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications [J].
Briez, N. ;
Piessen, G. ;
Torres, F. ;
Lebuffe, G. ;
Triboulet, J. -P. ;
Mariette, C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (11) :1547-1553
[5]   A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy [J].
Burdall, Oliver C. ;
Boddy, Alexander P. ;
Fullick, James ;
Blazeby, Jane ;
Krysztopik, Richard ;
Streets, Christopher ;
Hollowood, Andrew ;
Barham, Christopher P. ;
Titcomb, Dan .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (02) :431-437
[6]  
Cherian JV, 2007, J GASTROINTEST LIVER, V16, P245
[7]   Evidence to Support the Use of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer A Meta-analysis [J].
Dantoc, Marc ;
Cox, Michael R. ;
Eslick, Guy D. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (08) :768-776
[8]   Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes [J].
Giugliano, Danica N. ;
Berger, Adam C. ;
Rosato, Ernest L. ;
Palazzo, Francesco .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2016, 401 (06) :747-756
[9]   Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes [J].
Guo, Wei ;
Ma, Xiao ;
Yang, Su ;
Zhu, Xiaoli ;
Qin, Wei ;
Xiang, Jiaqing ;
Lerut, Toni ;
Li, Hecheng .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09) :3873-3881
[10]   Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [J].
Hulscher, JBF ;
van Sandick, JW ;
de Boer, AGEM ;
Wijnhoven, BPL ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Fockens, P ;
Stalmeier, PFM ;
ten Kate, FJW ;
van Dekken, H ;
Obertop, H ;
Tilanus, HW ;
van Lanschot, JJB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (21) :1662-1669