Multiple-choice examinations: adopting an evidence-based approach to exam technique

被引:26
作者
Hammond, EJ
McIndoe, AK
Sansome, AJ
Spargo, PM
机构
[1] Southampton Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Shackleton Dept Anaesthesia, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
[2] Bristol Royal Infirm, Sir Humphry Davy Dept Anaesthesia, Bristol BS2 8HW, Avon, England
关键词
education; examination technique;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00583.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Negatively marked multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are part of the assessment process in both the Primary and Final examinations for the fellowship of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. It is said that candidates who guess will lose marks in the MCQ paper. We studied candidates attending a pre-examination revision course and have shown that an evaluation of examination technique is an important part of an individual's preparation. All candidates benefited substantially from backing their educated guesses while only 3 out of 27 lost marks from backing their wild guesses. Failure to appreciate the relationship between knowledge and technique may significantly affect a candidate's performance in the examination.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1108
页数:4
相关论文
共 2 条
[1]  
HULL CJ, 1997, ROYAL COLL ANAESTHET, V32, P6
[2]  
STRUNIN L, 1997, ROYAL COLL ANAESTH S, V33, P5