Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Coffee: A Case of Thai Consumers

被引:4
|
作者
Ut-tha, Veenarat [1 ]
Lee, Pai-Po [1 ]
Chung, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Pingtung Univ Sci & Technol, Pingtung, Taiwan
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
WTP; sustainable coffee; contingent valuation method; logistic model; theory of reasoned action; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; PREMIUM PRICE; INTENTION; CHOICE; FOOD; VEGETABLES; ATTITUDES; PRODUCTS; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1177/21582440211052956
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to investigate the willingness to pay (WTP) for sustainable coffee, and its determinants as well. Drawing an empirical survey with 500 consumers in Thailand, contingent valuation method was performed to elicit the WTP for sustainable coffee. A logistic model was adapted to evaluate the impacts of factors under Fishbein and Ajzen's theory of reasoned action, that is, to test hypotheses of attitude and subjective norm, along with consumer characteristics on the WTP. Stata15 was adopted to analyze the cross-sectional data in logistic models; meanwhile probit regression was performed to confirm the results of the logistic model. The results indicate that attitude, self-brewing, marital status, past experience, job, and household income influence WTP. The WTP or premium price of sustainable coffee as compared to the conventional coffee is found to be 36.48%. Various stakeholders in coffee industry, for example, distributors, roasters, retailers and coffee farmers, as well as the policy makers, can act accordingly based upon the findings to develop a sustainable value-added coffee supply chain.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do front-of-pack 'green labels' increase sustainable food choice and willingness-to-pay in UK consumers?
    Duckworth, Jay J.
    Randle, Mark
    McGale, Lauren S.
    Jones, Andrew
    Doherty, Bob
    Halford, Jason C. G.
    Christiansen, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
  • [32] Factors Affecting Consumers' Potential Willingness to Pay for Organic Food Products in Iran: Case Study of Tabriz
    Haghjou, M.
    Hayati, B.
    Pishbahar, E.
    Mohammadrezaei, R.
    Dashti, Gh.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 15 (02): : 191 - 202
  • [33] Effect of Environmental and Altruistic Attitudes on Willingness-to-Pay for Organic and Fair Trade Coffee in Flanders
    Maaya, Leonard
    Meulders, Michel
    Surmont, Nick
    Vandebroek, Martina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [34] Consumers' willingness to pay for packaged chicken eggs in Lagos State, Nigeria
    Balogun, Olubunmi Lawrence
    Olumide, Martha Dupe
    Gbaiye, Opemipo Oloruntosin
    Ayo-Bello, Taofeek Ayodeji
    Akinwole, Oladele Timothy
    Ayantoye, Kayode
    AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, 2020, 5 (02): : 204 - 217
  • [35] Consumers' perceptions, preferences and willingness to pay for infant meat puree in China
    Yu, Xiaoling
    Liu, Kelin
    Cui, Yue
    Ma, Changming
    Zhu, Chaozhi
    Xu, Long
    CYTA-JOURNAL OF FOOD, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [36] Consumers' willingness to pay for GLOBALGAP certified chicken: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey in Bangladesh
    Hossain, Kh Zulfikar
    Xue, Jianhong
    Rabbany, Md Ghulam
    FOOD CONTROL, 2021, 130
  • [37] Organic consumers' price knowledge, willingness-to-pay and purchase decision
    Roediger, Manika
    Plassmann, Sabine
    Hamm, Ulrich
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2016, 118 (11): : 2732 - 2743
  • [38] Consumers' attitudes, trust and willingness to pay for food information
    Nocella, Giuseppe
    Romano, Donato
    Stefani, Gianluca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2014, 38 (02) : 153 - 165
  • [39] Effects of Information on Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Golden Rice
    Depositario, Dinah Pura T.
    Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
    Wu, Ximing
    Laude, Tiffany P.
    ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2009, 23 (04) : 457 - 476
  • [40] Valuation and willingness to pay for corn on the cob consumers in Mexico
    Zulema Jauregui, Carla
    Espejel Garcia, Anastacio
    Hernandez Montes, Arturo
    REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE AGRONOMIA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA, 2021, 38 (02): : 441 - 461