Shear Wave Velocity Profiling and Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential in Northeast Arkansas Using Simplified Equipment

被引:0
作者
Elsayed, A. [1 ]
Haran, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Arkansas State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Box 1740, State Univ, AR 72467 USA
[2] Arkansas State Univ, Dept Engn Mech, State Univ, AR 72467 USA
来源
HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2010, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2010年 / 7650卷
关键词
Earthquake; Liquefaction; Shear Wave Velocity; Northeast Arkansas; NMSZ; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1117/12.847718
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Soil liquefaction in Northeast Arkansas (NEA) is expected to result in substantial damage during seismic events. In situ shear wave velocity (V-s) profile of the subsurface, to a depth of at least 30-meters (according to the International Building Code or IBC), is necessary for determining the "Site Class", which is subsequently used in the structural analysis of buildings, and can be used as a screening tool to evaluate the depth and thickness of potentially liquefiable soil layers. Shear wave velocity profiles at 3 sites in Craighead County, AR were determined utilizing simplified equipment by means of a non-invasive technique. The results indicated good agreement with previous work performed by other researchers. These profiles were used to evaluate the liquefaction resistance at these sites using the simplified procedure by Seed and Idriss (V-s approach). The liquefaction resistance was also evaluated using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT approach) results from the geotechnical investigations that were conducted by others. The equipment and procedure should allow governmental agencies and engineering professional to determine the shear wave velocity profiles of the upper soil zones at relatively low cost. These profiles can aid different agencies in mapping areas of interest and assessing seismic hazard potential during planning future development or evaluating current facilities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Andrus R.D., 2000, J GEOTECHNICAL GEOEN
[2]   Magnitudes and locations of the 1811-1812 New Madrid, Missouri, and the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquakes [J].
Bakun, WH ;
Hopper, MG .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 94 (01) :64-75
[3]  
Blake T. F., P NCEER WORKSH EV LI
[4]   Liquefaction susceptibility mapping in the city of Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee [J].
Broughton, AT ;
Van Arsdale, RB ;
Broughton, JH .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2001, 62 (1-3) :207-222
[5]  
Chipperfield A., 1994, GENETIC ALGORITHM TO
[6]  
Elsayed A. S, 0803 TRC STAT ARK HI
[7]  
Hebeler G. L., 2001, Thesis
[8]  
Iwasaki T., 1978, PROC 2 INT C MICROZO
[9]  
Iwasaki T.T., 1982, Proceeding for the Third International Conference on Seismic Zonation, P1319
[10]  
Kramer S. L, 1996, GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQU