Price support allows communities to raise low-cost citizen finance for renewable energy projects

被引:4
作者
Braunholtz-Speight, Tim [1 ]
Sharmina, Maria [1 ]
Manderson, Edward [2 ]
McLachlan, Carly [1 ]
Hannon, Matthew [3 ]
Hardy, Jeff [4 ]
Mander, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Sci & Engn, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Dept Econ, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Strathclyde, Business Sch, Hunter Ctr Entrepreneurship, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Imperial Coll London, Grantham Inst, London, England
关键词
5;
D O I
10.1038/s41560-020-0556-2
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Community energy groups can raise citizen finance for renewable energy projects at lower interest rates than from commercial lenders, but they often depend on price guarantee schemes. Policies providing price stability and business model innovations are needed to realize the sector's potential contribution to the zero-carbon energy transition. Messages for Policy Schemes like the Feed-in Tariff provide price stability, thus de-risking community energy projects for citizen investors and allowing smaller projects to be funded by low-cost citizen finance. Without some price support, only a minority of current community renewables business models are likely to still be viable. Projects with an on-site customer for their power - typically solar rooftop photovoltaics on buildings with high daytime energy demand - are the ones that perform best without price support revenues. Growth of the sector could be supported by encouraging, or even mandating, public-sector bodies to purchase community-generated energy on long-term contracts. Alternatively, a floor price for exported electricity, or support for smaller projects in the UK power auctions scheme (Contracts for Difference), could provide price stability for community energy.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 128
页数:2
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, COMM EN FIN ROUNDT F
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, STAT SECT REP 2018
  • [3] A comparative analysis of the costs of onshore wind energy: Is there a case for community-specific policy support?
    Berka, Anna L.
    Harnmeijer, Jelte
    Roberts, Deborah
    Phimister, Euan
    Msika, Joshua
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 106 : 394 - 403
  • [4] Braunholtz-Speight T., 2018, The evolution of community energy in the UK
  • [5] Governing community energy-Feed-in tariffs and the development of community wind energy schemes in the United Kingdom and Germany
    Nolden, Colin
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 543 - 552