Comparison of Outcomes for Patients With Cervical Cancer Who Developed Bone Metastasis After the Primary Treatment With Concurrent Chemoradiation Versus Radiation Therapy Alone

被引:9
作者
Nartthanarung, Adisak [2 ]
Thanapprapasr, Duangmani [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med,Ramathibodi Hosp, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Fac Med, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
关键词
Concurrent chemoradiation; Cervical cancer; Bone metastasis; PELVIC RADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181ef8f4d
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aims of this study were to retrospectively compare outcomes for patients with cervical cancer who developed bone metastasis later after the primary treatment at the time of diagnosis of cervical cancer with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) to radiation therapy alone (RT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the patients with cervical cancer during the period from January 1998 to December 2007. Of these, 11 patients who received CCRT and 24 patients who received RT went on to develop bone metastasis. Results: Among 4620 patients with cervical cancer, 51 patients had bone metastases. Sixteen patients were excluded including 10 patients with unavailable records and 6 patients who did not receive CCRT or RT at the time of diagnosis of cervical cancer. Thirty-five patients who had bone metastasis received primary treatment with CCRT or RT. The 2 groups of patients (CCRT vs RT) were similar in age, histologic cell type, and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages. The characteristics of bone metastasis in both groups were also not significantly different. The patients who received CCRT did not have a better overall survival than the patients who received RT (median, 19 vs 22 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.68-23.32 vs 8.56-35.44). They were comparable in the interval from cervical cancer diagnoses to diagnoses of bone metastasis (CCRT group: median, 14 months; 95% CI, 9.14-18.86; RT group: median; 15 months; 95% CI, 10.20-19.80) and the survival after diagnosis of bone metastasis between both groups (CCRT group: median, 4 months; 95% CI, 0.76-7.24; RT group: median, 7 months; 95% CI, 4.70-9.30). Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis showed that there were no differences in survival benefits observed between the patients with cervical cancer who developed bone metastases later after the primary treatment with CCRT and RT.
引用
收藏
页码:1386 / 1390
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix - art. no. CD00225.pub2 [J].
Green, J ;
Kirwan, J ;
Tierney, J ;
Vale, C ;
Symonds, P ;
Fresco, L ;
Williams, C ;
Collingwood, M .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (03)
[2]  
HACKER NF, 2005, PRACTICAL GYNECOLOGI, P265
[3]   Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma [J].
Keys, HM ;
Bundy, BN ;
Stehman, FB ;
Muderspach, LI ;
Chafe, WE ;
Suggs, CL ;
Walker, JL ;
Gersell, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1154-1161
[4]   Comparison of radiation therapy alone and concurrent chemoradiation therapy in stage III cervical cancer: A multicenter retrospective study [J].
Lee, Jong-Min ;
Tong, Seo-Yun ;
Lee, Kwang-Beom ;
Kim, Young-Tae ;
Kim, Young-Jae ;
Kim, Jae Weon ;
Kim, Seok-Mo ;
Cho, Chi-Heum ;
Kim, Ki-Tae ;
Cho, Young-Lae ;
Lee, Kyu-Chan .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 88 (06) :707-712
[5]   Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer [J].
Morris, M ;
Eifel, PJ ;
Lu, JD ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Levenback, C ;
Stevens, RE ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, DM ;
Mutch, DG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1137-1143
[6]   Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix [J].
Peters, WA ;
Liu, PY ;
Barrett, RJ ;
Stock, RJ ;
Monk, BJ ;
Berek, JS ;
Souhami, L ;
Grigsby, P ;
Gordon, W ;
Alberts, DS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (08) :1606-1613
[7]   Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer [J].
Rose, PG ;
Bundy, BN ;
Watkins, EB ;
Thigpen, JT ;
Deppe, G ;
Maiman, MA ;
Clarke-Pearson, DL ;
Insalaco, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1144-1153
[8]   Results of concomitant chemoradiation for cervical cancer using high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy: Study of JROSG (Japan Radiation Oncology Study Group) [J].
Sakata, Koh-Ichi ;
Sakurai, Hideyuki ;
Suzuki, Yoshiyuki ;
Katoh, Shingo ;
Ohno, Tatsuya ;
Toita, Takafumi ;
Kataoka, Masaaki ;
Tanaka, Eiichi ;
Kaneyasu, Yuuko ;
Uno, Takashi ;
Harima, Yoko ;
Nakano, Takashi .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (03) :434-441
[9]  
Srivatanakul P, 2007, CANC THAILAND, VIV, P51
[10]  
Thanapprapasr D, 2010, CANC REPORT 2010, P410