Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland

被引:131
作者
Junge, Xenia [1 ]
Schuepbach, Beatrice [2 ]
Walter, Thomas [2 ]
Schmid, Bernhard [3 ]
Lindemann-Matthies, Petra [4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[2] Agroscope, Inst Sustainabil Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Karlsruhe Univ Educ, Dept Biol, Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Landscape seasonality; Aesthetic value; Biodiversity; Ecological compensation areas; Photo survey; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; SCENIC BEAUTY; VISUAL PREFERENCES; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTION; NATURALNESS; INDICATORS; VEGETATION; VALIDITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Maintenance of the agricultural landscape, preservation of biodiversity and landscape aesthetics are part of a multifunctional agriculture. However, little is known about the influence of single agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages on landscape aesthetics. In a Swisswide photo survey, the aesthetic preferences of Swiss residents for typical agricultural landscape elements in the Swiss lowlands were investigated. Photographs of seven ecological compensation areas (ECAs) and seven other elements (crops, high-intensity meadows and pastures) were selected. Each element was presented in four to six different seasonal stages, each on single paper-based questionnaire pages to allow a random selection of elements and seasonal stages. In addition, each element was replicated in each seasonal stage. Four randomly selected elements were sent to each study participant for aesthetic valuation (preference rating scores). Overall, ECAs received higher preference ratings than crops or high-intensity grassland. Most preferred were ECAs with a vertical structure, i.e. trees and bushes, and species-rich elements. In addition, the seasonal stage of a landscape element strongly influenced preference ratings. Flowering stages were clearly liked most. Moreover, perceived diversity and naturalness of an element had a strong positive effect on its rating. The results indicate that ECAs, besides their ecological function, are powerful elements to enhance the public's preference for agricultural landscapes. Moreover, the results might be useful for the development and adaptation of quantitative methods to capture the aesthetic value of agricultural regions and might provide a basis for political decisions concerning direct payments for aesthetic services of agriculture. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England [J].
Akbar, KF ;
Hale, WHG ;
Headley, AD .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2003, 63 (03) :139-144
[2]   THE ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL QUALITY AS A TOOL FOR THE CONSERVATION OF RURAL LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY [J].
ANGILERI, V ;
TOCCOLINI, A .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1993, 24 (1-4) :105-112
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, RM167 USDA FOR SERV
[4]  
[Anonymous], WITH PEOPLE IN MIND
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, THE EXPERIENCE OF NA
[6]  
Appleton J., 1975, The Experience of Landscape
[7]   Ecological cross compliance promotes farmland biodiversity in Switzerland [J].
Aviron, Stephanie ;
Nitsch, Heike ;
Jeanneret, Philippe ;
Buholzer, Serge ;
Luka, Henryk ;
Pfiffner, Lukas ;
Pozzi, Stefano ;
Schuepbach, Beatrice ;
Walter, Thomas ;
Herzog, Felix .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (05) :247-252
[8]   Impacts of Decoupled Agricultural Support on Farm Structure, Biodiversity and Landscape Mosaic: Some EU Results [J].
Brady, Mark ;
Kellermann, Konrad ;
Sahrbacher, Christoph ;
Jelinek, Ladislav .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 60 (03) :563-585
[9]  
Brassley Paul., 1998, Landscape Res, V23, P120, DOI DOI 10.1080/01426399808706531
[10]   From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape:: changing social perceptions of the European landscape [J].
Buijs, AE ;
Pedroli, B ;
Luginbühl, Y .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2006, 21 (03) :375-389