Environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy consumption-a cross-region analysis in China

被引:142
作者
Liu, Yulin [1 ]
Li, Zhihui [2 ]
Yin, Xingmin [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Ctr Publ Econ & Publ Policy Res, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Econ & Business Adm, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Energy consumption; Technological innovation; Counterfactual simulation; Feasible generalized least squares; INDUSTRIAL-STRUCTURE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; DEMAND RESPONSE; TIME-SERIES; PANEL-DATA; UNIT-ROOT; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY; POLICY; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.277
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China has encountered the environmental issues and energy pressures in the middle-income stage. Strengthening environmental regulation is a crucial measure to prevent environment deterioration and energy dilemma. This paper investigates the three types of environmental regulations on energy consumption using feasible generalized least squares method during 1997-2015 in direct and indirect path. The main conclusions are as follows. In the direct path, the economical and supervised types of environmental regulations have inhibited energy consumption whilst legal environmental regulation has no significant impact. As for indirect path, the "rebound effect" of energy is greater than the energy conservation generated by technological innovation, which is embodied as an inhibitory effect. The effects of environmental regulation display regional difference. The legal and supervised types of environmental regulations have significant "cost effect" and "rebound effect" on energy consumption in the entire samples. On the contrary, the economical environmental regulation shows the opposite sigh in eastern regions. The counterfactual simulation results show that the net effects of environmental regulations on energy consumption are negative, which is beneficial for relieving energy pressures. Based on the findings, this paper provides pertinent policy implications. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 897
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Amini M.H., 2015, 2015 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/NAPS.2015.7335100, 10.1109/NAPS.2015.7335100]
  • [2] The Rebound Effect in Swedish Heavy Industry
    Amjadi, Golnaz
    Lundgren, Tommy
    Persson, Lars
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 71 : 140 - 148
  • [3] [Anonymous], ENERGY EC
  • [4] [Anonymous], WORKING PAPER
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005 URB CHIN RES NE
  • [6] [Anonymous], RENEW SUSTAIN ENERGY
  • [7] [Anonymous], EC REV
  • [8] [Anonymous], TECHNOL FORECAST SOC
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2019, IEEE T SMART GRID, DOI DOI 10.1109/TSG.2018.2796034
  • [10] ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS
    ARELLANO, M
    BOVER, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) : 29 - 51