Relationships Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users

被引:1
作者
Brumer, Nadav [1 ]
Elkins, Elizabeth [1 ]
Hillyer, Jake [2 ]
Hazlewood, Chantel [1 ]
Parbery-Clark, Alexandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Neurosci Inst, Auditory Res Lab, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
cochlear implant; health related quality of life; speech perception; hearing loss; bimodal; bilateral; Glasgow Benefit Inventory; Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire; BINAURAL BENEFITS; LARGE COHORT; HEARING-AID; ADULTS; RECOGNITION; STIMULATION; PERFORMANCE; SURGERY; IMPACT; NOISE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859722
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
PurposePrevious studies examining the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and speech perception ability in cochlear implant (CI) users have yielded variable results, due to a range of factors, such as a variety of different HRQoL questionnaires and CI speech testing materials in addition to CI configuration. In order to decrease inherent variability and better understand the relationship between these measures in CI users, we administered a commonly used clinical CI speech testing battery as well as two popular HRQoL questionnaires in bimodal and bilateral CI users. MethodsThe Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), a modified five-factor version of the GBI (GBI-5F), and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were administered to 25 CI users (17 bimodal and 8 bilateral). Speech perception abilities were measured with the AzBio sentence test in several conditions (e.g., quiet and noise, binaural, and first-ear CI only). ResultsHigher performance scores on the GBI general subscore were related to greater binaural speech perception ability in noise. There were no other relationships between the GBI or NCIQ and speech perception ability under any condition. Scores on many of the GBI-5F factors were substantially skewed and asymmetrical; therefore, correlational analyses could not be applied. Across all participants, binaural speech perception scores were greater than first-ear CI only scores. ConclusionThe GBI general subscore was related to binaural speech perception, which is considered the everyday listening condition of bimodal and bilateral CI users, in noise; while the more CI-specific NCIQ did not relate to speech perception ability in any listening condition. Future research exploring the relationships between the GBI, GBI-5F, and NCIQ considering bimodal and bilateral CI configurations separately is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Speech Perception of Elderly Cochlear Implant Users Under Different Noise Conditions [J].
Hast, Anne ;
Schluecker, Luisa ;
Digeser, Frank ;
Liebscher, Tim ;
Hoppe, Ulrich .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (10) :1638-1643
[32]   Perception of speech by prelingual pre-adolescent and adolescent cochlear implant users [J].
Shpak, Talma ;
Koren, Lena ;
Tzach, Naama ;
Most, Tova ;
Luntz, Michal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (11) :775-783
[33]   Evaluation on health-related quality of life in deaf children with cochlear implant in China [J].
Liu, Hong ;
Liu, Hong-Xiang ;
Kang, Hou-Yong ;
Gu, Zheng ;
Hong, Su-Ling .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 88 :136-141
[34]   Transitioning From Bimodal to Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listening: Speech Recognition and Localization in Four Individuals [J].
Potts, Lisa G. ;
Litovsky, Ruth Y. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2014, 23 (01) :79-92
[35]   Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users [J].
Baumgaertel, Regina M. ;
Hu, Hongmei ;
Krawczyk-Becker, Martin ;
Marquardt, Daniel ;
Herzke, Tobias ;
Coleman, Graham ;
Adiloglu, Kamil ;
Bomke, Katrin ;
Plotz, Karsten ;
Gerkmann, Timo ;
Doclo, Simon ;
Kollmeier, Birger ;
Hohmann, Volker ;
Dietz, Mathias .
TRENDS IN HEARING, 2015, 19
[36]   Comparison between Bilateral Cochlear Implants and Neurelec Digisonic® SP Binaural Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception, Sound Localization and Patient Self-Assessment [J].
Bonnard, Damien ;
Lautissier, Sylvie ;
Bosset-Audoit, Amelie ;
Coriat, Geraldine ;
Beraha, Max ;
Maunoury, Antoine ;
Martel, Jacques ;
Darrouzet, Vincent ;
Bebear, Jean-Pierre ;
Dauman, Rene .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2013, 18 (03) :171-183
[37]   The effect of synchronized linked band selection on speech intelligibility of bilateral cochlear implant users [J].
Gajecki, Tom ;
Nogueira, Waldo .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 396
[38]   Evaluating Listening Effort in Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users [J].
Nyirjesy, Sarah C. ;
Lewis, Jessica H. ;
Hallak, Diana ;
Conroy, Sara ;
Moberly, Aaron C. ;
Tamati, Terrin N. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 170 (04) :1147-1157
[39]   The relationship between channel interaction, electrode placement, and speech perception in adult cochlear implant users [J].
Berg, Katelyn ;
Goldsworthy, Ray ;
Noble, Jack ;
Dawant, Benoit ;
Gifford, Rene .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 156 (06) :4289-4302
[40]   Comparison of Two Music Training Approaches on Music and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users [J].
Fuller, Christina D. ;
Galvin, John J., III ;
Maat, Bert ;
Baskent, Deniz ;
Free, Rolien H. .
TRENDS IN HEARING, 2018, 22