Green Finance Barriers and Solution Strategies for Emerging Economies: The Case of India

被引:13
作者
Wasan, Pratibha [1 ]
Kumar, Ashwani [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
机构
[1] Fore Sch Management, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Rohtak, Operat Management, Rohtak 124010, Haryana, India
[3] Ch Ranbir Singh State Inst Engn Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Jhajjar 124103, India
关键词
Green products; Air pollution; Finance; Investment; Green buildings; Sustainable development; Renewable energy sources; Climate finance; environmental management; green finance (GF); impact investing; socially responsible investing; sustainability; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INNOVATION; INVESTMENT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2021.3123185
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The need to increase green developers' access to finance is critical and urgent for emerging economies that are currently facing an annual green financing gap of $2.5 trillion. This article investigates barriers and strategies for promoting green finance (hereafter GF) in India which is one of the fastest emerging economies globally. The article uses a two-phase methodology. In the first phase, an exhaustive literature survey followed by a three-round modified Delphi method is used to extract significant barriers and solution strategies for GF adoption. In the second phase, the best worst method is used to rank the barriers using their relative weights, and the solution strategies by utilizing global weights as input. The article finds that policy, economic, and knowledge barriers are the top three barriers for GF adoption. Clear green policies and risk assessment frameworks; credit enhancement mechanisms for green developers; low-cost refinancing and securitization markets for green technology and products; and combining directed finance with incentivized finance, public finance with private finance, and financial markets with technology are some of the most important strategies obtained from this article for promoting GF adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 425
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Stern N, 2015, LION ROBB LECT, P1
  • [42] Tapscott D., 2017, WORLD EC FORUM
  • [43] Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in the Netherlands
    Vasileiadou, E.
    Huijben, J. C. C. M.
    Raven, R. P. J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 128 : 142 - 155
  • [44] Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?
    Veugelers, Reinhilde
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (10) : 1770 - 1778
  • [45] The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies
    Wang, Yao
    Zhi, Qiang
    [J]. CLEAN ENERGY FOR CLEAN CITY: CUE 2016 - APPLIED ENERGY SYMPOSIUM AND FORUM: LOW-CARBON CITIES AND URBAN ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 104 : 311 - 316
  • [46] Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research
    Wuestenhagen, Rolf
    Menichetti, Emanuela
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 40 : 1 - 10
  • [47] Optimal credit guarantee ratio for small and medium-sized enterprises' financing: Evidence from Asia
    Yoshino, Naoyuki
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2019, 62 : 342 - 356