Green Finance Barriers and Solution Strategies for Emerging Economies: The Case of India

被引:13
作者
Wasan, Pratibha [1 ]
Kumar, Ashwani [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
机构
[1] Fore Sch Management, New Delhi 110016, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Rohtak, Operat Management, Rohtak 124010, Haryana, India
[3] Ch Ranbir Singh State Inst Engn Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Jhajjar 124103, India
关键词
Green products; Air pollution; Finance; Investment; Green buildings; Sustainable development; Renewable energy sources; Climate finance; environmental management; green finance (GF); impact investing; socially responsible investing; sustainability; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INNOVATION; INVESTMENT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2021.3123185
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The need to increase green developers' access to finance is critical and urgent for emerging economies that are currently facing an annual green financing gap of $2.5 trillion. This article investigates barriers and strategies for promoting green finance (hereafter GF) in India which is one of the fastest emerging economies globally. The article uses a two-phase methodology. In the first phase, an exhaustive literature survey followed by a three-round modified Delphi method is used to extract significant barriers and solution strategies for GF adoption. In the second phase, the best worst method is used to rank the barriers using their relative weights, and the solution strategies by utilizing global weights as input. The article finds that policy, economic, and knowledge barriers are the top three barriers for GF adoption. Clear green policies and risk assessment frameworks; credit enhancement mechanisms for green developers; low-cost refinancing and securitization markets for green technology and products; and combining directed finance with incentivized finance, public finance with private finance, and financial markets with technology are some of the most important strategies obtained from this article for promoting GF adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 425
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Ethico-economic analysis of impact finance: The case of Green Bonds
    Paranque, Bernard
    Revelli, Christophe
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2019, 47 : 57 - 66
  • [32] Paul CL, 2008, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P7
  • [33] Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation - A systematic review of barriers and solutions
    Polzin, Friedemann
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 77 : 525 - 535
  • [34] Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: Exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries
    Polzin, Friedemann
    von Flotow, Paschen
    Klerkx, Laurens
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 103 : 34 - 46
  • [35] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 64 : 126 - 130
  • [36] Ritchie J., 2015, REV EC FINANCE, V5, P59
  • [37] Roy R., 2016, J RESPONSIBLE FINANC, V3, P1
  • [38] Schoenmaker Dirk., 2017, Bruegel Essay and Lecture Series
  • [39] Financing renewable energy in Africa - Key challenge of the sustainable development goals
    Schwerhoff, Gregor
    Sy, Mouhamadou
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 75 : 393 - 401
  • [40] Corporate environmental disclosure practices in India
    Sen, Mitali
    Mukherjee, Kuhali
    Pattanayak, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2011, 12 (02) : 139 - +