Resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: Is R0 resection an illusion? Genetic evaluation of venous resection margin affirmed unrecognized disease

被引:3
|
作者
Turrini, O. [1 ,4 ]
Gilabert, M. [2 ,4 ]
Ewald, J. [1 ]
Moutardier, V. [3 ]
Delpero, J. -R. [1 ]
Iovanna, J. -L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Paoli Calmettes, Dept Surg Oncol, 232 Blvd St Marguerite, F-13009 Marseille, France
[2] Inst Paoli Calmettes, Dept Med Oncol, F-13009 Marseille, France
[3] Hop Nord Marseille, Dept Digest Surg, F-13015 Marseille, France
[4] Univ Mediterranee, Inserm U1068, Parc Sci Luminy, F-13009 Marseille, France
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Margins; K-ras gene mutation; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; PORTAL-VEIN; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; SURVIVAL; CANCER; CLEARANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.05.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To assess the K-ras gene mutation in the histologically negative venous margin of a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) specimen and its impact on survival. Method: From 2007 to 2010, 22 patients underwent R0 PD for resecable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All specimens were stained and the portal vein (PV) bed was identified by blue ink; a 2 mm(3) sample (including the blue ink) was cut from a microscopic free-tumor block. DNA was extracted and assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction to detect the K-ras gene mutation. Twelve specimens (55%) (kras+ group) were identified with a K-ras mutation in the venous margin resection, and 10 specimens (kras-group) did not have K-ras mutation detected in the venous margin resection. Results: The two groups were comparable. Overall 3 years survival of patients of kras+ group versus patients of kras- group was 0 and 17% (P = 0.03), respectively. Median survival time of patients of kras+ group versus patients of kras-group was 16 months vs 25 months (P = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [1,11-1,88]), respectively. Conclusion: Genetic evaluation of venous resection margin affirmed unrecognized disease with strong impact on survival in more than 50% of patients with histologically R0 resection. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 333
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can a simplified CT response criteria for vascular involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy predict survival in patients who achieved subsequent R0 resection?
    Guo, Yang
    Czeyda-Pommersheim, Ferenc
    Miccio, Joseph A.
    Mahalingam, Sowmya
    Cecchini, Michael
    Pahade, Jay
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (12) : 5609 - 5617
  • [22] Evaluation of survival in patients after pancreatic head resection for ductal adenocarcinoma
    Marius Distler
    Felix Rückert
    Maximilian Hunger
    Stephan Kersting
    Christian Pilarsky
    Hans-Detlev Saeger
    Robert Grützmann
    BMC Surgery, 13
  • [23] A replaced right hepatic artery adjacent to pancreatic carcinoma should be divided to obtain R0 resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Okada, Ken-ichi
    Kawai, Manabu
    Hirono, Seiko
    Miyazawa, Motoki
    Shimizu, Atsushi
    Kitahata, Yuji
    Tani, Masaji
    Yamaue, Hiroki
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2015, 400 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [24] Emergent endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoduodenostomy does not prevent R0 resection in a pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer
    Larino-Noia, Jose
    Mejuto Fernandez, Rafael
    Paz Novo, Manuel
    de la Iglesia Garcia, Daniel
    Iglesias-Garcia, Julio
    Quiroga Castineira, Adriano
    Varo Perez, Evaristo
    Enrique Dominguez-Munoz, Juan
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 15 (01) : 263 - 267
  • [25] The "Real R0": A Resection Margin Smaller Than 0.1 cm is Associated with a Poor Prognosis After Oncologic Esophagectomy
    St-Amour, Penelope
    Winiker, Michael
    Sempoux, Christine
    Fasquelle, Francois
    Demartines, Nicolas
    Schaefer, Markus
    Mantziar, Styliani
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) : 7095 - 7106
  • [26] Emergent endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoduodenostomy does not prevent R0 resection in a pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer
    José Lariño-Noia
    Rafael Mejuto Fernández
    Manuel Paz Novo
    Daniel de la Iglesia García
    Julio Iglesias-García
    Adriano Quiroga Castiñeira
    Evaristo Varo Pérez
    Juan Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, 2022, 15 : 263 - 267
  • [27] Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on R0 resection rate for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Zakem, Sara J.
    Mueller, Adam C.
    Meguid, Cheryl
    Torphy, Robert J.
    Holt, Douglas E.
    Schefter, Tracey
    Messersmith, Wells A.
    McCarter, Martin D.
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    HPB, 2021, 23 (07) : 1072 - 1083
  • [28] Evaluation of a prospective surgical strategy of extended resection to achieve R0 status in gall bladder cancer
    Pottakkat B.
    Kapoor A.
    Prakash A.
    Singh R.K.
    Behari A.
    Kumar A.
    Kapoor V.K.
    Saxena R.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2013, 44 (1) : 33 - 40
  • [29] An R0 resection margin does improve overall survival after PDAC resection- real-world evidence from 6.000 cases from the German Cancer Registry Group
    von Fritsch, Lennart
    Duhn, Jannis
    Abdalla, Thaer S. A.
    Honselmann, Kim C.
    Bolm, Louisa
    Braun, Ruediger
    Kist, Markus
    Lapshyn, Hryhoriy
    Zeissig, Sylke Ruth
    Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika
    van Tol, Kees Kleihues
    Litkevych, Stanislav
    Reinwald, Fabian
    Sackmann, Andrea
    Franke, Bianca
    Holleczek, Bernd
    Krauss, Anna
    Deichmann, Steffen
    Keck, Tobias
    Wellner, Ulrich F.
    EJSO, 2025, 51 (06):
  • [30] Arterial involvement and resectability scoring system to predict R0 resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy
    Yoshifumi Noda
    Nisanard Pisuchpen
    Nathaniel D. Mercaldo
    Yurie Sekigami
    Theodoros Michelakos
    Anushri Parakh
    Jennifer Y. Wo
    Motaz Qadan
    Cristina Ferrone
    Keith D. Lillemoe
    David P. Ryan
    Jeffrey W. Clark
    Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo
    Theodore S. Hong
    Avinash R. Kambadakone
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 2470 - 2480