A Scheme for Software Defined ORS Satellite Networking

被引:17
作者
Feng, Jing [1 ]
Jiang, Lei [1 ]
Shen, Ye [1 ]
Ma, WeiJun [1 ]
Yin, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] PLA Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Meteorol & Oceanog, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
2014 IEEE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND CLOUD COMPUTING (BDCLOUD) | 2014年
关键词
ORS; SDN; networking scheme; network model;
D O I
10.1109/BDCloud.2014.19
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Space-ground integrative network is an important development direction for sustainable communication networks especially to the information system which contains the data acquiring in multiple ways including space and ground, data processing by amalgamation and so on. As a new satellite technology, ORS (Operationally Responsive Space) will provide a fast and flexible solution for emergency response such as aim tracking, dense earth-observation, communication relay and so on, which can be fast deployed or awoken and play an important role on-demand. However, most existing satellite communication follows a designated and static scheme that can't meet the dynamic networking requirements of ORS. In order to build a reliable ORS satellite network whose communication parameters can be reconfigured such as task region, work time, cooperation satellites, QoS and so on, a new satellite network architecture should be studied. Firstly, based on software defined network (SDN) technology, a networking scheme for ORS satellites was proposed in literally, named SDN-SatArc, which adopted a light-structure. It can also receive and process the instructions of ground center. Then ORS satellite network model was designed according to network meta-model defined by us to allow describing current ORS satellite states, and compute the necessary multi-hop route in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 721
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic Viability of Software Defined Networking (SDN)
    Karakus, Murat
    Durresi, Arjan
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2018, 135 : 81 - 95
  • [22] Applicability of Software Defined Networking in Industrial Ethernet
    Kalman, Gyorgy
    2014 22ND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM TELFOR (TELFOR), 2014, : 340 - 343
  • [23] Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
    Kreutz, Diego
    Ramos, Fernando M. V.
    Verissimo, Paulo Esteves
    Rothenberg, Christian Esteve
    Azodolmolky, Siamak
    Uhlig, Steve
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2015, 103 (01) : 14 - 76
  • [24] Energy Efficiency in Software Defined Networking: A Survey
    Rout S.
    Sahoo K.S.
    Patra S.S.
    Sahoo B.
    Puthal D.
    SN Computer Science, 2021, 2 (4)
  • [25] Challenges and solutions in Software Defined Networking: A survey
    Saraswat, Surbhi
    Agarwal, Vishal
    Gupta, Hari Prabhat
    Mishra, Rahul
    Gupta, Ashish
    Dutta, Tanima
    JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 2019, 141 : 23 - 58
  • [26] Software-Defined Networking of Linux Containers
    Costache, Cosmin
    Machidon, Octavian
    Mladin, Adrian
    Sandu, Florin
    Bocu, Razvan
    2014 ROEDUNET CONFERENCE 13TH EDITION: NETWORKING IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH JOINT EVENT RENAM 8TH CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [27] Verification Framework for Software-Defined Networking
    Kang, Miyoung
    Cho, Jong Jin
    2022 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICACT): ARITIFLCIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES TOWARD CYBERSECURITY, 2022, : 518 - 523
  • [28] Software-Defined Networking: On the Verge of a Breakthrough?
    Ortiz, Sixto, Jr.
    COMPUTER, 2013, 46 (07) : 10 - 12
  • [29] Service Cost in Software Defined Networking (SDN)
    Karakus, Murat
    Durresi, Arjan
    2017 IEEE 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS (AINA), 2017, : 468 - 475
  • [30] Software Defined Networking for Heterogeneous Access Networks
    Robinson, Matthew
    Milosavljevic, Milos
    Kourtessis, Pandelis
    Stafford, Gary P.
    Burrell, Malcolm J.
    Senior, John M.
    2016 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPARENT OPTICAL NETWORKS (ICTON), 2016,