Color and context: An ERP study on intrinsic and extrinsic feature binding in episodic memory

被引:81
作者
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
Zimmer, Hubert D.
Groh-Bordin, Christian
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Dept Psychol, D-66041 Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Norwegian Acad Sci & Letters, Ctr Adv Study, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03193618
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Episodic memory for intrinsic item and extrinsic context information is postulated to rely on two distinct types of representation: object and episodic tokens. These provide the basis for familiarity and recollection, respectively. Electrophysiological indices of these processes (ERP old-new effects) were used together with behavioral data to test these assumptions. We manipulated an intrinsic object feature (color; Experiment 1) and a contextual feature (background; Experiments I and 2). In an inclusion task (Experiment 1), the study-test manipulation of color affected object recognition performance and modulated ERP old-new effects associated with both familiarity and recollection. In contrast, a contextual manipulation had no effect, although both intrinsic and extrinsic information was available in a direct feature (source memory) test. When made task relevant (exclusion task; Experiment 2), however, context affected the ERP recollection effect, while still leaving the ERP familiarity effect uninfluenced. We conclude that intrinsic features bound in object tokens are involuntarily processed during object recognition, thus influencing familiarity, whereas context features bound in episodic tokens are voluntarily accessed, exclusively influencing recollection. Figures depicting all the electrodes analyzed are available in an online supplement at www.psychononiic.org/archive.
引用
收藏
页码:1483 / 1501
页数:19
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Aggleton JP, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P425
[2]   PERCEPTUAL CONDITIONS OF ASSOCIATION [J].
ASCH, SE ;
CERASO, J ;
HEIMER, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1960, 74 (03) :1-48
[3]   Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for the acquisition of semantic memory? [J].
Baddeley, AD ;
Vargha-Khadem, F ;
Mishkin, M .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (03) :357-369
[4]  
Cabeza R., 2006, HDB BINDING MEMORY P, P595, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198529675.003.0024
[5]   UNIT FORMATION IN PERCEPTION AND MEMORY [J].
CERASO, J .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1985, 19 :179-210
[6]  
Ceraso J., 1990, LEGACY S ASCH ESSAYS, P113
[7]   METRIC INVARIANCE IN OBJECT RECOGNITION - A REVIEW AND FURTHER EVIDENCE [J].
COOPER, EE ;
BIEDERMAN, I ;
HUMMEL, JE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1992, 46 (02) :191-214
[8]   ERP old/new effects at different retention intervals in recency discrimination tasks [J].
Curran, T ;
Friedman, WJ .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (02) :107-120
[9]   Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition [J].
Curran, T ;
Cleary, AM .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 15 (02) :191-205
[10]   Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: An ERP study [J].
Curran, T ;
Dien, J .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) :979-988