Contrast-enhanced Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience

被引:157
作者
Prionas, Nicolas D. [1 ]
Lindfors, Karen K. [1 ]
Ray, Shonket [1 ]
Huang, Shih-Ying [1 ]
Beckett, Laurel A. [2 ]
Monsky, Wayne L. [1 ]
Boone, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biostat, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR ANGIOGENESIS; DIAGNOSIS; FEATURES; MDCT; MRI;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10092311
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify contrast material enhancement of breast lesions scanned with dedicated breast computed tomography (CT) and to compare their conspicuity with that at unenhanced breast CT and mammography. Materials and Methods: Approval of the institutional review board and the Radiation Use Committee and written informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Between September 2006 and April 2009, 46 women (mean age, 53.2 years; age range, 35-72 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 lesions underwent unenhanced breast CT and contrast material-enhanced breast CT before biopsy. Two radiologists independently scored lesion conspicuity for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus mammography and for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus unenhanced breast CT. Mean lesion voxel intensity was measured in Hounsfield units and normalized to adipose tissue intensity on manually segmented images obtained before and after administration of contrast material. Regression models focused on conspicuity and quantified enhancement were used to estimate the effect of pathologic diagnosis (benign vs malignant), lesion type (mass vs calcifications), breast density, and interradiologist variability. Results: Fifty-four lesions (25 benign, 29 malignant) in 46 subjects were analyzed. Malignant lesions were seen significantly better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) or mammography (P < .001). Malignant calcifi cations (malignant lesions manifested mammographically as microcalcifications only, n = 7) were seen better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) and were seen similarly at contrast-enhanced breast CT and mammography. Malignant lesions enhanced 55.9 HU +/- 4.0 (standard error), whereas benign lesions enhanced 17.6 HU +/- 6.1 (P,.001). Ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 5) enhanced a mean of 59.6 HU +/- 2.8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of lesion enhancement yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.876. Conclusion: Conspicuity of malignant breast lesions, including ductal carcinoma in situ, is significantly improved at contrast-enhanced breast CT. Quantifying lesion enhancement may aid in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 723
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Breast Cancer facts and figures 2009-2010
  • [2] Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT
    Boone, JM
    Kwan, ALC
    Seibert, JA
    Shah, N
    Lindfors, KK
    Nelson, TR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) : 3767 - 3776
  • [3] Computed tomography for imaging the breast
    Boone, John M.
    Kwan, Alex L. C.
    Yang, Kai
    Burkett, George W.
    Lindfors, Karen K.
    Nelson, Thomas R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMARY GLAND BIOLOGY AND NEOPLASIA, 2006, 11 (02) : 103 - 111
  • [4] CHANG CHJ, 1980, CANCER, V46, P939, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19800815)46:4+<939::AID-CNCR2820461315>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-L
  • [6] COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF BREAST
    CHANG, CHJ
    SIBALA, JL
    FRITZ, SL
    GALLAGHER, JH
    DWYER, SJ
    TEMPLETON, AW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1978, 131 (03) : 459 - 464
  • [7] SPECIFIC VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC BREAST SCANNER (CT-M) IN DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST DISEASES
    CHANG, CHJ
    SIBALA, JL
    FRITZ, SL
    DWYER, SJ
    TEMPLETON, AW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1979, 132 (03) : 647 - 652
  • [8] Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis
    Chen, Sara C.
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Albert, Michael
    Conant, Emily F.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) : 229 - 238
  • [9] Tumor angiogenesis:: pathophysiology and implications for contrast-enhanced MRI and CT assessment
    Cuenod, CA
    Fournier, L
    Balvay, D
    Guinebretière, JM
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2006, 31 (02): : 188 - 193
  • [10] Functional imaging in CT
    Dawson, Peter
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (03) : 331 - 340