EEG Channel Selection Methods for Motor Imagery in Brain Computer Interface

被引:1
|
作者
Mu, Wei [1 ]
Fang, Tao [1 ]
Wang, Pengchao [1 ]
Wang, Junkongshuai [1 ]
Wang, Aiping [1 ]
Niu, Lan [2 ]
Bin, Jianxiong [2 ]
Liu, Lusheng [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Jia, Jie [3 ]
Zhang, Lihua [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Xiaoyang [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Acad Engn & Technol,MOE Frontiers Ctr Brain Sci, Inst AI & Robot,Minist Educ,Shanghai Engn Res Ctr, Lab Neural Interface & Brain Comp Interface,Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Ji Hua Lab, Foshan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Yiwu Res Inst, Chengbei Rd, Yiwu City 322000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Lab, Res Ctr Intelligent Sensing, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
channel selection; EEG; motor imagery; brain computer interface;
D O I
10.1109/BCI53720.2022.9734929
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
EEG is widely applied in motor imagery because of its non-invasive and easy access. However, multi-channel EEG signals cause noise interference and redundant information. Channel selection can reduce the noisy signal to obtain more real signals. Therefore, many studies focus on the influence of channel selection algorithms on motion imagery decoding. This paper summarizes the characteristics of channel selection methods for decoding motion imagination tasks and compares their methods and results. One way to select the channel is based on neural network and takes the channel as the input parameter of the neural network; Another is an EEG classification method based on statistical information. Statistical information such as CSP rank, cross-correlation, and Pearson correlation coefficient is used to sort channels. In addition, we also discuss the relationship between the channel selection algorithm and high-density electrode design.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generalized Optimal EEG Channels Selection for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface
    Lee, Hsiang-Chen
    Lee, Ching-Hung
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (20) : 25356 - 25366
  • [2] EEG Features Extraction and Classification Methods in Motor Imagery Based Brain Computer Interface
    Malass, Mahmoud
    Tabbal, Judie
    El Falou, Wassim
    2019 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ICABME), 2019, : 196 - 199
  • [3] An EEG channel selection method for motor imagery based brain-computer interface and neurofeedback using Granger causality
    Varsehi, Hesam
    Firoozabadi, S. Mohammad P.
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2021, 133 : 193 - 206
  • [4] Classifier Selection for Motor Imagery Brain Computer Interface
    Rejer, Izabela
    Burduk, Robert
    COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT (CISIM 2017), 2017, 10244 : 122 - 130
  • [5] EEG datasets for motor imagery brain-computer interface
    Cho, Hohyun
    Ahn, Minkyu
    Ahn, Sangtae
    Kwon, Moonyoung
    Jun, Sung Chan
    GIGASCIENCE, 2017, 6 (07): : 1 - 8
  • [6] Relevance-based channel selection in motor imagery brain-computer interface
    Nagarajan, Aarthy
    Robinson, Neethu
    Guan, Cuntai
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [7] Real-Time Single Channel EEG Motor Imagery based Brain Computer Interface
    Camacho, Jaime
    Manian, Vidya
    2016 WORLD AUTOMATION CONGRESS (WAC), 2016,
  • [8] An Automatic Channel Selection Approach for ICA-Based Motor Imagery Brain Computer Interface
    Ruan, Jing
    Wu, Xiaopei
    Zhou, Bangyan
    Guo, Xiaojing
    Lv, Zhao
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (12)
  • [9] An Iterative Optimization Technique for Robust Channel Selection in Motor Imagery based Brain Computer Interface
    Shenoy, H. Vikram
    Vinod, A. P.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2014, : 1858 - 1863
  • [10] A Wearable Channel Selection-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Motor Imagery Detection
    Lo, Chi-Chun
    Chien, Tsung-Yi
    Chen, Yu-Chun
    Tsai, Shang-Ho
    Fang, Wai-Chi
    Lin, Bor-Shyh
    SENSORS, 2016, 16 (02):