Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study

被引:8
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Ezra, Yossef [1 ]
Weill, Yishay [2 ]
Kabiri, Doron [1 ]
Pollack, Raphael N. [3 ]
Rottenstreich, Amihai [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, POB 12000, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Meuhedet HMO, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Amniotic fluid index; breech; external cephalic version; nifedipine; ritodrine; BREECH PRESENTATION; TOCOLYSIS; DELIVERY; TERBUTALINE; SUCCESS; LABOR; TERM;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2019.1677589
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Published series regarding interventions for facilitating external cephalic version (ECV) have concluded that parenterally administered beta-stimulant tocolytics, increased ECV success rate and reduced the number of cesarean sections. However, there were insufficient data regarding calcium channel blockers to provide good evidence regarding its efficacy. Given the paucity of literature, we aimed to compare the efficacy of nifedipine to that of ritodrine on ECV success rates. Methods This is a retrospective case control study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent ECV between January 2012 and December 2013 at Bikur Cholim Medical Center and Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel. Patient undergoing ECV with tocolysis by ritodrine were compared with those using nifedipine as tocolysis. Patients were matched in a one-to-one ration by parity and placental location. Results Overall, 148 women received ritodrine and 148 women received nifedipine before ECV procedure. Overall success rate was higher among the ritodrine group (82.4 vs. 63.5%, p<.001). Among nulliparous and among parous, success rate was higher in the ritodrine group (78.9 vs. 57.9 and 88.6 vs. 73.5%, p=.001, p=.04, respectively). Vaginal delivery rate was higher among the ritodrine group (86.5 vs. 68.9%, p<.001). Cesarean delivery rate was 31.1% for the nifedipine group versus 13.5% in the ritodrine group (p<.001). Number needed to treat to benefit (NNTb) 5.7 (95% confidence interval 3.7-12.1). Overall, 216 of 296 (72.9%) of ECV were successful. Ritodrine was associated with higher success rates as compared with nifedipine (56.5 vs. 32.5%, p<.001). In a multivariate analysis, ritodrine tocolytic therapy was independently associated higher ECV success rates as compared to nifedipine (OR 4.54, 95% CI 2.38-9.09). Higher amniotic fluid index (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28) and nulliparity (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.30) were additional independent predictors of ECV outcome. Conclusion Ritodrine significantly improve the success of ECV compared with nifedipine. Both drugs are shown to be safe.
引用
收藏
页码:3008 / 3013
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sublingual nitroglycerin versus placebo as a tocolytic for external cephalic version: A randomized controlled trial in parous women
    Bujold, E
    Boucher, M
    Rinfret, D
    Berman, S
    Ferreira, E
    Marquette, GP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1070 - 1073
  • [42] The effect of transient fetal bradycardia and other heart rate changes during and after external cephalic version on perinatal outcomes
    Hruban, Lukas
    Janku, Petr
    Jordanova, Kristyna
    Huptych, Michal
    Jouzova, Anna
    Gerychova, Romana
    Ventruba, Pavel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 245 : 39 - 44
  • [43] Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
    Sanchez-Romero, Javier
    Lopez-Perez, Jesus
    Flores-Munoz, Ana Belen
    Mendez-Martinez, Maria Josefa
    Araico-Rodriguez, Fernando
    Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime
    Blanco-Carnero, Jose Eliseo
    Falcon-Arana, Luis
    Nieto-Diaz, Anibal
    Sanchez-Ferrer, Maria Luisa
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [44] Effect of Super-Specialization in External Cephalic Version: A Comparative Study
    Sanchez-Romero, Javier
    Araico-Rodriguez, Fernando
    Herrera-Gimenez, Javier
    Eliseo Blanco-Carnero, Jose
    Maria Gallego-Pozuelo, Rosa
    Nieto-Diaz, Anibal
    Luisa Sanchez-Ferrer, Maria
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 49 (11)
  • [45] Atosiban versus fenoterol as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: randomised controlled trial
    Velzel, Joost
    Vlemmix, Floortje
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Molkenboer, Jan F. M.
    Verhoeven, Corine J.
    van Pampus, Marielle G.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
    Bais, Joke M. J.
    Vollebregt, Karlijn C.
    van der Esch, Liesbeth
    Van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Kok, Marjolein
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [46] Patient opinion of analgesia during external cephalic version at term in singleton pregnancy
    Rodriguez, Leire
    Osuna, Carmen
    Pijoan, Jose I.
    Cobos, Patricia
    Centeno, Maria M.
    Serna, Rosa
    Jimenez, Antonia
    Artola, Izaskun
    Melchor, Inigo
    Martinez-Astorquiza, Txanton
    Melchor, Juan C.
    Burgos, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 40 (06) : 767 - 771
  • [47] Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study
    Lee Reicher
    Anat Lavie
    Yuval Fouks
    Ofer Isakov
    Emmanuel Attali
    Yariv Yogev
    Sharon Maslovitz
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 303 : 911 - 916
  • [48] A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term
    Burgos, Jorge
    Carlos Melchor, Juan
    Ignacio Pijoan, Jose
    Cobos, Patricia
    Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis
    Martinez-Astorquiza, Txanton
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 112 (01) : 48 - 51
  • [49] Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term
    Fok, WY
    Chan, LW
    Leung, TY
    Lau, TK
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (08) : 748 - 751
  • [50] Funic presentation as a complication of external cephalic version - A case report
    Gimovsky, ML
    Boyd, C
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 44 (10) : 897 - 898