Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study

被引:8
|
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Ezra, Yossef [1 ]
Weill, Yishay [2 ]
Kabiri, Doron [1 ]
Pollack, Raphael N. [3 ]
Rottenstreich, Amihai [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, POB 12000, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Meuhedet HMO, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Amniotic fluid index; breech; external cephalic version; nifedipine; ritodrine; BREECH PRESENTATION; TOCOLYSIS; DELIVERY; TERBUTALINE; SUCCESS; LABOR; TERM;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2019.1677589
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Published series regarding interventions for facilitating external cephalic version (ECV) have concluded that parenterally administered beta-stimulant tocolytics, increased ECV success rate and reduced the number of cesarean sections. However, there were insufficient data regarding calcium channel blockers to provide good evidence regarding its efficacy. Given the paucity of literature, we aimed to compare the efficacy of nifedipine to that of ritodrine on ECV success rates. Methods This is a retrospective case control study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent ECV between January 2012 and December 2013 at Bikur Cholim Medical Center and Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel. Patient undergoing ECV with tocolysis by ritodrine were compared with those using nifedipine as tocolysis. Patients were matched in a one-to-one ration by parity and placental location. Results Overall, 148 women received ritodrine and 148 women received nifedipine before ECV procedure. Overall success rate was higher among the ritodrine group (82.4 vs. 63.5%, p<.001). Among nulliparous and among parous, success rate was higher in the ritodrine group (78.9 vs. 57.9 and 88.6 vs. 73.5%, p=.001, p=.04, respectively). Vaginal delivery rate was higher among the ritodrine group (86.5 vs. 68.9%, p<.001). Cesarean delivery rate was 31.1% for the nifedipine group versus 13.5% in the ritodrine group (p<.001). Number needed to treat to benefit (NNTb) 5.7 (95% confidence interval 3.7-12.1). Overall, 216 of 296 (72.9%) of ECV were successful. Ritodrine was associated with higher success rates as compared with nifedipine (56.5 vs. 32.5%, p<.001). In a multivariate analysis, ritodrine tocolytic therapy was independently associated higher ECV success rates as compared to nifedipine (OR 4.54, 95% CI 2.38-9.09). Higher amniotic fluid index (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28) and nulliparity (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.30) were additional independent predictors of ECV outcome. Conclusion Ritodrine significantly improve the success of ECV compared with nifedipine. Both drugs are shown to be safe.
引用
收藏
页码:3008 / 3013
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Riemma, Gaetano
    Schiattarella, Antonio
    La Verde, Marco
    Cianci, Stefano
    Savoia, Fabiana
    De Franciscis, Pasquale
    Cobellis, Luigi
    Colacurci, Nicola
    Morlando, Maddalena
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 258 : 86 - 92
  • [22] External cephalic version: 1 year study in a level 3 maternity
    Roux-Chevalier, M.
    Gaucherand, P.
    Cluze, C.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2011, 39 (06): : 346 - 350
  • [23] Labour outcome of women with successful external cephalic version: A prospective study
    Jain, S.
    Mulligama, C.
    Tagwira, V.
    Guyer, C.
    Cheong, Y.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 30 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [24] Hypnosis for the Control of Pain Associated with External Cephalic Version: A Comparative Study
    Guittier, Marie-Julia
    Guillemin, Francis
    Farinelli, Edith Brandao
    Irion, Olivier
    Boulvain, Michel
    de Tejada, Begona Martinez
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2013, 19 (10) : 820 - 825
  • [25] Tocolysis during External Cephalic Version (ECV): A retrospective before/after study in a type III maternity hospital
    Le Bars, S.
    Harendarczyk, L.
    Mortier, A.
    Riche, V. -P.
    Arthuis, C.
    Thubert, T.
    Winer, N.
    Dochez, V.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2022, 50 (09): : 585 - 590
  • [26] External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18years' experience
    Melo, P.
    Georgiou, E. X.
    Hedditch, A.
    Ellaway, P.
    Impey, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (04) : 493 - 499
  • [27] Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version
    Floortje Vlemmix
    Ageeth N Rosman
    Margot AH Fleuren
    Marlies EB Rijnders
    Antje Beuckens
    Monique C Haak
    Bettina MC Akerboom
    Joke MJ Bais
    Simone MI Kuppens
    Dimitri N Papatsonis
    Brent C Opmeer
    Joris AM van der Post
    Ben Willem J Mol
    Marjolein Kok
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10
  • [28] External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks
    Collaris, RJ
    Oei, SG
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (06) : 511 - 518
  • [29] THE BENEFIT OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION WITH TOCOLYSIS AS A ROUTINE PROCEDURE IN LATE PREGNANCY
    THUNEDBORG, P
    FISCHERRASMUSSEN, W
    TOLLUND, L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1991, 42 (01): : 23 - 27
  • [30] Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study
    Rosman, A. N.
    Vlemmix, F.
    Ensing, S.
    Opmeer, B. C.
    te Hoven, S.
    Velzel, J.
    de Hundt, M.
    van den Berg, S.
    Rota, H.
    van der Post, J. A. M.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Kok, M.
    MIDWIFERY, 2016, 39 : 44 - 48