Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study

被引:8
|
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Ezra, Yossef [1 ]
Weill, Yishay [2 ]
Kabiri, Doron [1 ]
Pollack, Raphael N. [3 ]
Rottenstreich, Amihai [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, POB 12000, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Meuhedet HMO, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Amniotic fluid index; breech; external cephalic version; nifedipine; ritodrine; BREECH PRESENTATION; TOCOLYSIS; DELIVERY; TERBUTALINE; SUCCESS; LABOR; TERM;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2019.1677589
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Published series regarding interventions for facilitating external cephalic version (ECV) have concluded that parenterally administered beta-stimulant tocolytics, increased ECV success rate and reduced the number of cesarean sections. However, there were insufficient data regarding calcium channel blockers to provide good evidence regarding its efficacy. Given the paucity of literature, we aimed to compare the efficacy of nifedipine to that of ritodrine on ECV success rates. Methods This is a retrospective case control study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent ECV between January 2012 and December 2013 at Bikur Cholim Medical Center and Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem, Israel. Patient undergoing ECV with tocolysis by ritodrine were compared with those using nifedipine as tocolysis. Patients were matched in a one-to-one ration by parity and placental location. Results Overall, 148 women received ritodrine and 148 women received nifedipine before ECV procedure. Overall success rate was higher among the ritodrine group (82.4 vs. 63.5%, p<.001). Among nulliparous and among parous, success rate was higher in the ritodrine group (78.9 vs. 57.9 and 88.6 vs. 73.5%, p=.001, p=.04, respectively). Vaginal delivery rate was higher among the ritodrine group (86.5 vs. 68.9%, p<.001). Cesarean delivery rate was 31.1% for the nifedipine group versus 13.5% in the ritodrine group (p<.001). Number needed to treat to benefit (NNTb) 5.7 (95% confidence interval 3.7-12.1). Overall, 216 of 296 (72.9%) of ECV were successful. Ritodrine was associated with higher success rates as compared with nifedipine (56.5 vs. 32.5%, p<.001). In a multivariate analysis, ritodrine tocolytic therapy was independently associated higher ECV success rates as compared to nifedipine (OR 4.54, 95% CI 2.38-9.09). Higher amniotic fluid index (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28) and nulliparity (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.30) were additional independent predictors of ECV outcome. Conclusion Ritodrine significantly improve the success of ECV compared with nifedipine. Both drugs are shown to be safe.
引用
收藏
页码:3008 / 3013
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ritodrine versus salbutamol for external cephalic version
    Levin, Gabriel
    Cahan, Tal
    Weill, Yishay
    Axelrod, Michal
    Pollack, Raphael N.
    Meyer, Raanan
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 74 (04) : 337 - 342
  • [2] Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version
    Couceiro Naveira, Emilio
    Ramon y Cajal, Carlos Lopez
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [3] Nifedipine versus terbutaline for tocolysis in external cephalic version
    Ismail, Nor Azlin Mohamed
    Ibrahim, Maryasalwati
    Naim, Norzilawati Mohd
    Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah
    Jamil, Mohammad Abdul
    Razi, Zainul Rashid Mohd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 102 (03) : 263 - 266
  • [4] Ritodrine in external cephalic version: is it effective and safe?
    Kim, Sin Ae
    Cha, Eun-Hwan
    Chun, Kyoung-Chul
    Kim, Young Ah
    Koh, Jae-Whoan
    Han, Jung Yeol
    Hwang, Jong Hee
    OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2022, 65 (05) : 420 - 429
  • [5] Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review
    Wilcox, C. B.
    Nassar, N.
    Roberts, C. L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 423 - 428
  • [6] The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version
    Stergiotou, Iosifina
    Talbot, Fleur
    Yoong, Wai
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (08) : 927 - 929
  • [7] External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
    Sanchez-Romero, Javier
    Garcia-Soria, Vanesa
    Araico-Rodriguez, Fernando
    Herrera-Gimenez, Javier
    Blanco-Carnero, Jose E.
    Nieto-Diaz, Anibal
    Luisa Sanchez-Ferrer, Maria
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2020, (160): : 1 - 7
  • [8] Predictors of success of external cephalic version: Bi-center study
    Dochez, V.
    Delbos, L.
    Esbelin, J.
    Volteau, C.
    Winer, N.
    Sentilhes, L.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2016, 45 (05): : 509 - 515
  • [9] External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: A cohort study of 100 consecutive attempts
    Impey, Olivia R. E.
    Greenwood, Catherine E. L.
    Impey, Lawrence W. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 231 : 210 - 213
  • [10] Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study
    Burgos, Jorge
    Eguiguren, Nekane
    Quintana, Eider
    Cobos, Patricia
    del Mar Centeno, Maria
    Larrieta, Rosa
    Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (01) : 23 - 28