Visitors' perception based on five physical senses on ecosystem services of urban parks from the perspective of landsenses ecology

被引:39
作者
Zheng, T. [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Y. [1 ]
Lu, H. [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Q. [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, J. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, C. [1 ]
Zhang, W. [1 ,3 ]
Rong, Y. [1 ]
Zhan, Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Resource & Environm Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landsense; urban ecology; ecosystem services; urban park; perception; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; GREEN SPACES; CITY; HEALTH; SATISFACTION; LANDSCAPE; ENVIRONMENTS; AMENITY; QUALITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2020.1729272
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban parks not only improve the urban ecology but also provide cultural ecosystem services to city dwellers. This study investigated the relationship between cultural ecosystem services provided by urban parks and visitors' perception of urban park from the perspective of landsenses ecology. A perceptual indicator system was developed following the analysis of landsense elements among the park elements, for four sensory dimensions. A perceptual assessment model was established using the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) method, which could be used to divide the perceptual indicators into five grades. We found that the importance level of perceptual indicators was influenced by the type of park elements and the functional area of the visitors' sensory apparatus. On the one hand, park elements that are common or can be perceived easily receive more attention. On the other hand, among the distance receptors, wider functional area might be related to the higher importance level of the perceptual indicators; the immediate receptors also have considerable influence on perception since visitors contact with the environment directly through these. The most important indicators were related to vision and touch, including 'vision of plants', 'vision of water', 'feel of sunlight', 'touch of roads', and 'sound of animals'. Furthermore, we conducted an assessment on landsense satisfaction of a typical urban park in Beijing, suggesting ways to improve visitors' perception of urban parks from the perspective of landsenses ecology. The assessment showed that the urban park design and management practices could be improved to increase visitors' satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 223
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [11] Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing
    Coley, RL
    Kuo, FE
    Sullivan, WC
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1997, 29 (04) : 468 - 494
  • [12] Daily G. C., 1997, Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems., P113
  • [13] Landsenses ecological planning for the Xianghe Segment of China's Grand Canal
    Dong, Rencai
    Liu, Xin
    Liu, Miaoling
    Feng, Qiyuan
    Su, Xiaodan
    Wu, Gang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 298 - 304
  • [14] Elderly satisfaction with planning and design of public parks in high density old districts: An ordered logit model
    Esther, Yung H. K.
    Winky, Ho K. O.
    Edwin, Chan H. W.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2017, 165 : 39 - 53
  • [15] Effects of landscape composition and pattern on land surface temperature: An urban heat island study in the megacities of Southeast Asia
    Estoque, Ronald C.
    Murayama, Yuji
    Myint, Soe W.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 577 : 349 - 359
  • [16] Evans M. R., 1989, Hospitality Education and Research Journal, V13, P203
  • [17] Gehl J., 1987, Life between Buildings: Using Public Space
  • [18] Noise and well-being in urban residential environments:: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas
    Gidlof-Gunnarsson, Anita
    Ohrstrom, Evy
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2007, 83 (2-3) : 115 - 126
  • [19] Go F. M., 1997, Journal of Travel Research, V35, P42
  • [20] Grahn Patrik, 2003, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V2, P001, DOI 10.1078/1618-8667-00019