The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature

被引:173
作者
Brandes, Kim [1 ]
Linn, Annemiek J. [1 ]
Butow, Phyllis N. [2 ]
van Weert, Julia C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Ctr Med Psychol & Evidence Based Decis Making CeM, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
cancer; oncology; Question Prompt List; patient participation; systematic review; intervention; PROMOTING PATIENT PARTICIPATION; ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS; MEDICAL CONSULTATIONS; INFORMATION NEEDS; COMMUNICATION; SHEET; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIANS; RECALL;
D O I
10.1002/pon.3637
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveQuestion Prompt Lists (QPLs) have been used extensively in the oncology setting to improve communication, psychological and/or cognitive outcomes. In this systematic review, the objectives were to (a) examine the methodological quality of QPL interventions, (b) review the effectiveness of QPL interventions on communication, psychological and/or cognitive outcomes of cancer patients, (c) gain more insight into the characteristics of QPL interventions (e.g., the number and content of questions, and the mode of delivery) and (d) explore whether the effectiveness of QPL interventions might be explained by their characteristics. MethodA systematic literature search was conducted in PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL and CENTRAL. Empirical studies that investigated the use and effectiveness of QPL interventions in an oncology setting were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane method. ResultsSixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Results indicated evidence for the effectiveness of QPL interventions in enhancing patient participation (i.e., question asking). Furthermore, there was evidence that QPL interventions can influence psychological outcomes (i.e., anxiety at follow-up) and cognitive outcomes (i.e., recall of information). The majority of QPL interventions were given to patients before their consultation in hardcopy. In most studies, QPLs were combined with other intervention components. It is suggested that characteristics of a QPL intervention (i.e., the number of questions on a QPL and provider training) can influence its effectiveness. ConclusionQuestion Prompt List interventions are effective in improving communication, psychological and cognitive outcomes of cancer patients. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 252
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Impact of a novel nurse-led prechemotherapy education intervention (ChemoEd) on patient distress, symptom burden, and treatment-related information and support needs: results from a randomised, controlled trial [J].
Aranda, S. ;
Jefford, M. ;
Yates, P. ;
Gough, K. ;
Seymour, J. ;
Francis, P. ;
Baravelli, C. ;
Breen, S. ;
Schofield, P. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) :222-U19
[2]   Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior [J].
Arora, NK .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (05) :791-806
[3]  
Bensings J, 2004, COMMUNICATION MED EN
[4]   Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question asking [J].
Brown, R ;
Butow, PN ;
Boyer, MJ ;
Tattersall, MHN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 80 (1-2) :242-248
[5]   Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial [J].
Brown, RF ;
Butow, P ;
Dunn, SM ;
Tattersall, MHN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (09) :1273-1279
[6]   Breast cancer patient perception of the helpfulness of a prompt sheet versus a general information sheet during outpatient consultation: A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Bruera, E ;
Sweeney, C ;
Willey, J ;
Palmer, JL ;
Tolley, S ;
Rosales, M ;
Ripamonti, C .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2003, 25 (05) :412-419
[7]   Cancer consultation preparation package: Changing patients but not physicians is not enough [J].
Butow, P ;
Devine, R ;
Boyer, M ;
Pendlebury, S ;
Jackson, M ;
Tattersall, MHN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (21) :4401-4409
[8]   Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues [J].
Butow, PN ;
Brown, RF ;
Cogar, S ;
Tattersall, MHN ;
Dunn, SM .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2002, 11 (01) :47-58
[9]   PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN THE CANCER CONSULTATION - EVALUATION OF A QUESTION PROMPT SHEET [J].
BUTOW, PN ;
DUNN, SM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
JONES, QJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :199-204
[10]   Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care [J].
Clayton, Josephine M. ;
Butow, Phyllis N. ;
Tattersall, Martin H. N. ;
Devine, Rhonda J. ;
Simpson, Judy M. ;
Aggarwal, Ghauri ;
Clark, Katherine J. ;
Currow, David C. ;
Elliott, Louise M. ;
Lacey, Judith ;
Lee, Philip G. ;
Noel, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (06) :715-723