Stakeholder Involvement for Sustainable Energy Development Based on Uncertain Group Decision Making: Prioritizing the Renewable Energy Heating Technologies and the BWM-WASPAS-IN Approach

被引:25
作者
Balezentis, Tomas [1 ]
Siksnelyte-Butkiene, Indre [1 ]
Streimikiene, Dalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Ctr Social Sci, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
renewable energy technologies; renewable heating; multi-criteria decision-making; households; BWM; WASPAS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; GENERATION; SYSTEMS; SECTOR; POLICY; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSUMPTION; HOUSEHOLDS; POLLUTION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2021.103114
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a multi-criteria decision framework for promotion of the heating systems based on the renewable energy sources. The objective and subjective data are taken into consideration by the virtue of the relevant quantitative techniques. The paper integrates the Best-Worst method (BWM) and modifies the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method. The BWM is utilized for eliciting the weights of the criteria during the expert survey. We apply the interval-normalized WASPAS for the multi-criteria ranking of the heating technologies. Thus, the uncertainty is taken into consideration. The empirical application deals with the case of Lithuania where modernization of the heating system is rather important in order to reduce energy poverty and increase the quality of life. Three heating technologies (i.e. heat pumps, solar heating and wood pellet boilers) are assessed through the expert survey and multi-criteria evaluation methods. The multi-criteria analysis suggests wood pellet boilers and solar heating dominate the heat pumps in terms of the overall utility and could be promoted as the most suitable renewable heating technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Potential carbon dioxide emission reductions from avoided grassland conversion in the northern Great Plains [J].
Ahlering, Marissa ;
Fargione, Joseph ;
Parton, William .
ECOSPHERE, 2016, 7 (12)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050, V2019
[3]  
Association of Lithuanian Heat, 2019, SUPPL LITH DISTR HEA
[4]   A model for urban sector drivers of carbon emissions [J].
Azizalrahman, Hossny ;
Hasyimi, Valid .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 :46-55
[5]   Selection of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for a Low-Income Household [J].
Babatunde, Olubayo M. ;
Munda, Josiah L. ;
Hamam, Yskandar .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
[6]   More priorities, more problems? Decision-making with multiple energy, development and climate objectives [J].
Bhardwaj, Ankit ;
Joshi, Madhura ;
Khosla, Radhika ;
Dubash, Navroz K. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 49 :143-157
[7]   Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies [J].
Campos-Guzman, Veronica ;
Socorro Garcia-Cascales, M. ;
Espinosa, Nieves ;
Urbina, Antonio .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 104 :343-366
[8]   Multicriteria Approach towards the Sustainable Selection of a Teahouse Location with Sensitivity Analysis [J].
Chen, Ji ;
Wang, Jinsheng ;
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Zagurskaite, Fausta ;
Streimikiene, Dalia ;
Makuteniene, Daiva .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[9]   Sustainability evaluation and sensitivity analysis of district heating systems coupled to geothermal and solar resources [J].
Chen, Yuzhu ;
Wang, Jun ;
Lund, Peter D. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 220
[10]   Applications of MCDM methods in research on corporate sustainability A systematic literature review [J].
Chowdhury, Priyabrata ;
Paul, Sanjoy Kumar .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2020, 31 (02) :385-405