Integrating plant-plant competition for nitrogen into a 3D individual-based model simulating the effects of cropping systems on weed dynamics

被引:9
作者
Moreau, Delphine [1 ]
Pointurier, Olivia [1 ]
Perthame, Laurene [1 ]
Beaudoin, Nicolas [2 ]
Villerd, Jean [1 ,3 ]
Colbach, Nathalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bourgogne, AgroSup Dijon, Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, Agroecol,INRAE, F-21000 Dijon, France
[2] INRAE, BioEcoAgro Joint Res Unit, Site Laon,180 PG de Gennes, F-02000 Barenton B, France
[3] Univ Lorraine, LAE, INRAE, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Weed; Nitrogen; Competition; Model; Cropping system; Biological regulation; PEA-BARLEY INTERCROPS; DILUTION CURVE; N-2; FIXATION; DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; USE EFFICIENCY; LEAF NITROGEN; WINTER-WHEAT; DRY-MATTER; YIELD LOSS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108166
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Promoting biological weed regulation via competition for resources requires better understanding the functioning of heterogeneous canopies in nitrogen-deficient situations. Mechanistic simulation models are powerful tools to reach this goal. Our objective was to integrate plant-plant competition for nitrogen into the preexisting FLORSYS model simulating the effects of cropping systems on weed dynamics and crop production. The formalisms were either created or inspired from other models and adapted to make them compatible with the individualbased representation of FLORSYS. Plant nitrogen uptake was simulated by confronting plant nitrogen demand (driven by shoot growth) to plant nitrogen supply (depending on root characteristics, soil-nitrogen availability and the presence of neighboring plants with roots in the same soil zone). A nitrogen stress index allowed accounting for the impact of plant nitrogen nutrition on plant photosynthesis, biomass allocation and morphology. The new formalisms consisted of only seven species-specific parameters. Despite simplifying hypotheses in formalisms, predictions were in good agreement with knowledge on canopy functioning and crop-weed interactions. We provide the first mechanistic cropping system model focusing on weeds that simulates plant-plant competition for nitrogen (in addition to competition for light). It will be useful to understand the role of nitrogen in crop-weed interactions and identify agroecological management strategies promoting weed regulation by competition.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 115 条
  • [1] Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen
    Andersson, TN
    Milberg, P
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 1998, 46 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [2] Competition between winter wheat and Veronica hederifolia: Influence of weed density and the amount and timing of nitrogen application
    Angonin, C
    Caussanel, JP
    Meynard, JM
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (02) : 175 - 187
  • [3] Evaluation of the soil crop model STICS over 8 years against the "on farm" database of Bruyeres catchment
    Beaudoin, N.
    Launay, M.
    Sauboua, E.
    Ponsardin, G.
    Mary, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 29 (01) : 46 - 57
  • [4] Does soil nitrogen affect early competitive traits of annual weeds in comparison with maize?
    Berger, A.
    Mcdonald, A. J.
    Riha, S. J.
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2007, 47 (06) : 509 - 516
  • [5] Berger AG, 2013, ADV AGR SYST MODEL, V4, P229, DOI 10.2134/advagricsystmodel4.c10
  • [6] Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply of available nitrogen?
    Berry, PM
    Sylvester-Bradley, R
    Philipps, L
    Hatch, DJ
    Cuttle, SP
    Rayns, FW
    Gosling, P
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 18 : 248 - 255
  • [7] Blackshaw RE, 2003, WEED SCI, V51, P532, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0532:DROWST]2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Nitrogen fertilizer rate effects on weed competitiveness is species dependent
    Blackshaw, Robert E.
    Brandt, Randall N.
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2008, 56 (05) : 743 - 747
  • [10] Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security
    Bommarco, Riccardo
    Kleijn, David
    Potts, Simon G.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2013, 28 (04) : 230 - 238