First trimester fasting glucose and glycated haemoglobin cut-offs associated with abnormal glucose homeostasis in the post-partum reclassification in women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy

被引:8
作者
Chaves, Catarina [1 ]
Cunha, Filipe M. [1 ]
Martinho, Mariana [1 ]
Garrido, Susana [1 ]
Silva-Vieira, Margarida [1 ]
Estevinho, Catarina [2 ]
Melo, Anabela [2 ]
Figueiredo, Odete [2 ]
Morgado, Ana [2 ]
Nogueira, Claudia [3 ]
Almeida, Maria C. [4 ]
Almeida, Margarida [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Tamega & Sousa, Serv Endocrinol, Ave Hosp Padre Amer 210, P-4564007 Guilhufe, Penafiel, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hosp Tamega & Sousa, Serv Ginecol & Obstet, Penafiel, Portugal
[3] Ctr Hosp Tras Os Montes & Alto Douro, Serv Endocrinol, Vila Real, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp & Univ Coimbra, Maternidade Bissaya Barreto, Serv Obstet, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Gestational diabetes mellitus; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Fasting hyperglycaemia; Glycated haemoglobin; Reclassification; Cut-off; GESTATIONAL DIABETES-MELLITUS; HBA1C; RISK; TOLERANCE; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; TERM;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-021-06107-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Hyperglycaemia first detected during pregnancy is either gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or previous undiagnosed diabetes. We aimed to study if there were a first trimester fasting glycaemia (FTG) and a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) cut-off values associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or abnormal glucose homeostasis (AGH) at the post-partum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) reclassification. We retrospectively studied a group of pregnant women from the Portuguese National Registry of GDM. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the best FTG and HbA1c cut-offs to predict T2DM and AGH. We studied 4068 women. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) for the association with T2DM was 0.85 (0.80-0.90) for FTG and 0.85 (0.80-0.91) for HbA1c. The best FTG cut-off for association with T2DM was 99 mg/dL: sensitivity 77.4%, specificity 74.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 4.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 99.5%. The best HbA1c cut-off for association with T2DM was 5.4%: sensitivity 79.0%, specificity 80.1%, PPV 5.7%, and NPV 99.6%. The AUC for the association of FTG and HbA1c with AGH were 0.73 (0.70-0.76) and 0.71 (0.67-0.74), respectively. The best FTG cut-off for predicting AGH was 99 mg/dL: sensitivity 59.4%, specificity 76.2%, PPV 17.0%, and NPV 95.8%. The best HbA1c cut-off was 5.4%: sensitivity 48.7%, specificity 81.5%, PPV 17.8%, and NPV 95.1%. We suggest an FTG of 99 mg/dL and an HbA1c of 5.4% as the best cut-offs below which T2DM is unlikely to be present. Almost all patients with FTG < 99 mg/dL and HbA1c < 5.4% did not reclassify as T2DM. These early pregnancy cut-offs might alert the physician for the possibility of a previous undiagnosed diabetes and alert them to the importance of testing for it after delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 482
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Obstetricians seldom provide postpartum diabetes screening for women with gestational diabetes [J].
Almario, Christopher V. ;
Ecker, Teresa ;
Moroz, Leslie A. ;
Bucovetsky, Lynne ;
Berghella, Vincenzo ;
Baxter, Jason K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 198 (05) :528.e1-528.e5
[2]   Postpartum Reclassification of Glycemic Status in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Associated Risk Factors [J].
Alves, Jacy Maria ;
Stollmeier, Aline ;
Leite, Isabelle Gasparetto ;
Pilger, Camilla Gallo ;
Melchioretto Detsch, Josiane Cristine ;
Radominski, Rosana Bento ;
Rea, Rosangela Roginski .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2016, 38 (08) :381-390
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Obstet Gynecol, V131, pe49, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Revista Portuguesa de Diabetes, V12, P24
[5]   Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: An exposure-wide umbrella review of meta-analyses [J].
Bellou, Vanesa ;
Belbasis, Lazaros ;
Tzoulaki, Ioanna ;
Evangelou, Evangelos .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03)
[6]   Diabetic Nephropathy and Pregnancy [J].
Bramham, Kate .
SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 37 (04) :362-369
[7]  
Brown J, 2015, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4, P1465
[8]   Gestational diabetes mellitus [J].
Buchanan, TA ;
Xiang, AH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2005, 115 (03) :485-491
[9]   Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short term and long term adverse consequences for mother and child [J].
Catalano, Patrick M. ;
Shankar, Kartik .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
[10]   Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019 [J].
Cefalu, William T. ;
Berg, Erika Gebel ;
Saraco, Mindy ;
Petersen, Matthew P. ;
Uelmen, Sacha ;
Robinson, Shamera .
DIABETES CARE, 2019, 42 :S165-S172