Impact of Real-Time Elastography on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Biopsy in Patients with Prior Negative Prostate Biopsies

被引:46
作者
Brock, Marko [1 ]
Loeppenberg, Bjoern [1 ]
Roghmann, Florian [1 ]
Pelzer, Alexandre [3 ]
Dickmann, Martin [3 ]
Becker, Wolfgang [4 ]
Martin-Seidel, Philipp [4 ]
Sommerer, Florian [2 ]
Schenk, Lena [1 ]
Palisaar, Rein Jueri [1 ]
Noldus, Joachim [1 ]
von Bodman, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Marienhosp Herne, Dept Urol, Herne, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Berufsgenossenschaftl Univ Klin Bergmannsheli Gmb, Dept Pathol, Bochum, Germany
[3] Klin Ingolstadt, Dept Urol, Ingolstadt, Germany
[4] Radiol Gemeinschaftspraxis Herne, Herne, Germany
关键词
elasticity imaging techniques; prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; fusion; ULTRASOUND FUSION; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; TARGETED BIOPSY; CANCER; SYSTEM; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.106
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The fusion of multiparametric resonance imaging and ultrasound has been proven capable of detecting prostate cancer in different biopsy settings. The addition of real-time elastography promises to increase the precision of the outcome of targeted biopsies. We investigated whether real-time elastography improves magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy in patients after previous negative biopsies. Materials and Methods: Prospectively 121 men underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Using magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion every suspicious lesion was characterized according to its tissue density and sampled by 2 fusion guided targeted biopsies. Additionally, all patients underwent 12-core systematic biopsy. The detection rate of clinically significant and insignificant cancers was compared between targeted und systematic biopsies. The accuracy to predict high grade prostate cancer was evaluated for with the PI-RADS scoring system and compared to the magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion score. Results: Overall prostate cancer was detected in 52 patients (43%). Targeted fusion guided biopsy revealed prostate cancer in 32 men (26.4%) and systematic biopsy in 46 (38%). The proportion of clinically significant cancers was higher for targeted biopsy (90.6%) compared to systematic biopsy (73.9%). The detection rate per core was higher for targeted biopsies (14.7%) compared to systematic biopsies (6.5%, p < 0.001). The prediction of biopsy result according to magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion was better (AUC 0.86) than magnetic resonance imaging alone (AUC 0.79). Sensitivity and specificity for magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion was 77.8% and 77.3% vs 74.1% and 62.9% for magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion enhances the likelihood of detecting clinically significant cancers in a repeat biopsy setting. Adding real-time elastography to magnetic resonance imaging supports the characterization of cancer suspicious lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1197
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[2]   Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system [J].
Bax, Jeffrey ;
Cool, Derek ;
Gardi, Lori ;
Knight, Kerry ;
Smith, David ;
Montreuil, Jacques ;
Sherebrin, Shi ;
Romagnoli, Cesare ;
Fenster, Aaron .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) :5397-5410
[3]  
Brock M, 2014, ULTRASCHALL MED
[4]   Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy [J].
Brock, Marko ;
von Bodman, Christian ;
Sommerer, Florian ;
Loeppenberg, Bjoern ;
Klein, Tobias ;
Deix, Thomas ;
Palisaar, Jueri Rein ;
Noldus, Joachim ;
Eggert, Thilo .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E217-E222
[5]   Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: When should we stop? [J].
Djavan, B ;
Ravery, V ;
Zlotta, A ;
Dobronski, P ;
Dobrovits, M ;
Fakhari, M ;
Seitz, C ;
Susani, M ;
Borkowski, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Schulman, CC ;
Marberger, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1679-1683
[6]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[7]   Prospective blinded comparison of real-time sonoelastography targeted versus randomised biopsy of the prostate in the primary and re-biopsy setting [J].
Ganzer, Roman ;
Brandtner, Andreas ;
Wieland, Wolf F. ;
Fritsche, Hans-Martin .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) :219-223
[8]   A Novel Stereotactic Prostate Biopsy System Integrating Pre-Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Live Ultrasound Fusion [J].
Hadaschik, Boris A. ;
Kuru, Timur H. ;
Tulea, Corina ;
Rieker, Philip ;
Popeneciu, Ionel V. ;
Simpfendoerfer, Tobias ;
Huber, Johannes ;
Zogal, Pawel ;
Teber, Dogu ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Roethke, Matthias ;
Zamecnik, Patrik ;
Roth, Wilfried ;
Sakas, Georgios ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Hohenfellner, Markus .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) :2214-2220
[9]   EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease [J].
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Mason, Malcolm ;
Matveev, Vsevolod ;
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Schmid, Hans-Peter ;
van der Kwast, Theo ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Zattoni, Filliberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) :61-71
[10]   Model selection for incomplete and design-based samples [J].
Hens, N. ;
Aerts, M. ;
Molenberghs, G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (14) :2502-2520