The Role of Public-Sector Research in the Discovery of Drugs and Vaccines.

被引:135
作者
Stevens, Ashley J. [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Jonathan J. [1 ,2 ]
Wyller, Katrine [3 ]
Kilgore, Patrick C. [4 ]
Chatterjee, Sabarni [5 ]
Rohrbaugh, Mark L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Management, Inst Technol Entrepreneurship & Commercializat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Management, Off Technol Dev, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Norwegian Radium Hosp Res Fdn, Oslo, Norway
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Law, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] NIH, Off Technol Transfer, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa1008268
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Historically, public-sector researchers have performed the upstream, basic research that elucidated the underlying mechanisms of disease and identified promising points of intervention, whereas corporate researchers have performed the downstream, applied research resulting in the discovery of drugs for the treatment of diseases and have carried out development activities to bring them to market. However, the boundaries between the roles of the public and private sectors have shifted substantially since the dawn of the biotechnology era, and the public sector now has a much more direct role in the applied-research phase of drug discovery. Methods: We identified new drugs and vaccines approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that were discovered by public-sector research institutions (PSRIs) and classified them according to their therapeutic category and potential therapeutic effect. Results: We found that during the past 40 years, 153 new FDA-approved drugs, vaccines, or new indications for existing drugs were discovered through research carried out in PSRIs. These drugs included 93 small-molecule drugs, 36 biologic agents, 15 vaccines, 8 in vivo diagnostic materials, and 1 over-the-counter drug. More than half of these drugs have been used in the treatment or prevention of cancer or infectious diseases. PSRI-discovered drugs are expected to have a disproportionately large therapeutic effect. Conclusions: Public-sector research has had a more immediate effect on improving public health than was previously realized. N Engl J Med 2011;364:535-41.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 541
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], VACC BLOOD BIOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GAO09742
[3]  
[Anonymous], TOMORROWS TECHNOL TR
[4]  
Bremer H, 2009, PATENT TRADEMAR 0814
[5]  
Cockburn I, 1997, 6018 NAT BUR EC RES
[6]   The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs [J].
DiMasi, JA ;
Hansen, RW ;
Grabowski, HG .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 22 (02) :151-185
[7]  
Food and Drug Administration, DRUG APPR DAT
[8]  
Food and Drug Administration, OR BOOK APPR DRUG PR
[9]  
Graham B, 1978, WASHINGTON POST 0408, pM2
[10]   THE ROLE OF THE RESEARCH-BASED PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY IN MEDICAL PROGRESS IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
KAITIN, KI ;
BRYANT, NR ;
LASAGNA, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 33 (05) :412-417