Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review

被引:21
作者
McGrady, Meghan E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pai, Ahna L. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Prosser, Lisa A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Canc & Blood Dis Inst, Patient & Family Wellness Ctr, Div Behav Med & Clin Psychol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Pediat, Child Hlth Evaluat & Res Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Psychological intervention; behavioural intervention; discrete choice experiment; MENTAL-HEALTH-SERVICES; BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PREFERENCES; INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCES; INTERIM SERVICE; EXERCISE; CARE; ACCEPTABILITY; ADOLESCENTS; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1080/17437199.2020.1715813
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Developing and/or tailoring psychological interventions to align with patient preferences is a critical component of patient-centered care and has the potential to improve patient engagement and treatment outcomes. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a quantitative method of assessing patient preferences that offer numerous strengths (i.e., ability to account for trade-offs), but are not routinely incorporated into health psychology coursework, likely leaving many unaware of the potential benefits of this methodology. To highlight the potential applications of DCEs within health psychology, this systematic review synthesises previous efforts to utilise DCEs to inform the design of patient-centered psychological care, defined as interventions targeting psychological (e.g., depression, anxiety) or behavioural health (e.g., pain management, adherence) concerns. Literature searches were conducted in March 2017 and November 2019 for articles reporting on DCEs using the terms 'discrete choice', 'conjoint', or 'stated preference'. Thirty-nine articles met all inclusion criteria and used DCEs to understand patient preferences regarding psychosocial clinical services (n = 12), lifestyle behaviour change interventions (n = 11), HIV prevention and/or intervention services (n = 10), disease self-management programmes (n = 4), or other interventions (n = 2). Clinical implications as well as limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 332
页数:19
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Individual preferences for physical exercise as secondary prevention for non-specific low back pain: A discrete choice experiment [J].
Aboagye, Emmanuel ;
Hagberg, Jan ;
Axen, Iben ;
Kwak, Lydia ;
Lohela-Karlsson, Malin ;
Skillgate, Eva ;
Dahlgren, Gunilla ;
Jensen, Irene .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12)
[2]   A discrete-choice experiment to elicit preferences of patients with epilepsy for self-management programs [J].
Atkinson-Clark, Edward ;
Charokopou, Mata ;
Van Osselaer, Nancy ;
Hiligsmann, Mickael .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 79 :58-67
[3]   Investigating service features to sustain engagement in early intervention mental health services [J].
Becker, Mackenzie ;
Cunningham, Charles E. ;
Christensen, Bruce K. ;
Furimsky, Ivana ;
Rimas, Heather ;
Wilson, Fiona ;
Jeffs, Lisa ;
Madsen, Victoria ;
Bieling, Peter ;
Chen, Yvonne ;
Mielko, Stephanie ;
Zipursky, Robert B. .
EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 13 (02) :241-250
[4]   Preferences for Early Intervention Mental Health Services: A Discrete-Choice Conjoint Experiment [J].
Becker, Mackenzie P. E. ;
Christensen, Bruce K. ;
Cunningham, Charles E. ;
Furimsky, Ivana ;
Rimas, Heather ;
Wilson, Fiona ;
Jeffs, Lisa ;
Bieling, Peter J. ;
Madsen, Victoria ;
Chen, Yvonne Y. S. ;
Mielko, Stephanie ;
Zipursky, Robert B. .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2016, 67 (02) :184-191
[5]   Combining Individual-Level Discrete Choice Experiment Estimates and Costs to Inform Health Care Management Decisions about Customized Care: The Case of Follow-Up Strategies after Breast Cancer Treatment [J].
Benning, Tim M. ;
Kimman, Merel L. ;
Dirksen, Carmen D. ;
Boersma, Liesbeth J. ;
Dellaert, Benedict G. C. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (05) :680-689
[6]  
Bridges J., 2007, ISPOR Connect, V13, P4
[7]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[8]   The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions [J].
Burton, Christopher D. ;
Entwistle, Vikki A. ;
Elliott, Alison M. ;
Krucien, Nicolas ;
Porteous, Terry ;
Ryan, Mandy .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04)
[9]   Using partial profile choice experiments to handle large numbers of attributes [J].
Chrzan, Keith .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2010, 52 (06) :827-840
[10]   Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature [J].
Clark, Michael D. ;
Determann, Domino ;
Petrou, Stavros ;
Moro, Domenico ;
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) :883-902