Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review

被引:18
作者
McGrady, Meghan E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pai, Ahna L. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Prosser, Lisa A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Canc & Blood Dis Inst, Patient & Family Wellness Ctr, Div Behav Med & Clin Psychol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Pediat, Child Hlth Evaluat & Res Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Psychological intervention; behavioural intervention; discrete choice experiment; MENTAL-HEALTH-SERVICES; BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PREFERENCES; INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCES; INTERIM SERVICE; EXERCISE; CARE; ACCEPTABILITY; ADOLESCENTS; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1080/17437199.2020.1715813
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Developing and/or tailoring psychological interventions to align with patient preferences is a critical component of patient-centered care and has the potential to improve patient engagement and treatment outcomes. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a quantitative method of assessing patient preferences that offer numerous strengths (i.e., ability to account for trade-offs), but are not routinely incorporated into health psychology coursework, likely leaving many unaware of the potential benefits of this methodology. To highlight the potential applications of DCEs within health psychology, this systematic review synthesises previous efforts to utilise DCEs to inform the design of patient-centered psychological care, defined as interventions targeting psychological (e.g., depression, anxiety) or behavioural health (e.g., pain management, adherence) concerns. Literature searches were conducted in March 2017 and November 2019 for articles reporting on DCEs using the terms 'discrete choice', 'conjoint', or 'stated preference'. Thirty-nine articles met all inclusion criteria and used DCEs to understand patient preferences regarding psychosocial clinical services (n = 12), lifestyle behaviour change interventions (n = 11), HIV prevention and/or intervention services (n = 10), disease self-management programmes (n = 4), or other interventions (n = 2). Clinical implications as well as limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 332
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of discrete choice experiments in stroke rehabilitation
    Jolliffe, Laura
    Christie, Lauren J.
    Fearn, Nicola
    Nohrenberg, Michael
    Liu, Rasia
    Williams, Julie F.
    Parsons, Mark W.
    Pearce, Alison M.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024, 31 (06) : 632 - 643
  • [2] Patient-Centered Outcomes of Medication Adherence Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Conn, Vicki S.
    Ruppar, Todd M.
    Enriquez, Maithe
    Cooper, Pamela S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 277 - 285
  • [3] Pharmacists' Preferences for Providing Patient-Centered Services: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Guide Health Policy
    Grindrod, Kelly A.
    Marra, Carlo A.
    Colley, Lindsey
    Tsuyuki, Ross T.
    Lynd, Larry D.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 44 (10) : 1554 - 1564
  • [4] Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments
    Zhu, Mengting
    Dong, Dong
    Lo, Hermione Hin-Man
    Wong, Samuel Yeung-Shan
    Mo, Phoenix Kit-Han
    Sit, Regina Wing-Shan
    PAIN, 2023, 164 (04) : 675 - 689
  • [5] Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review
    Vass, Caroline
    Gray, Ewan
    Payne, Katherine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2016, 38 (03) : 620 - 630
  • [6] Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review
    Caroline Vass
    Ewan Gray
    Katherine Payne
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2016, 38 : 620 - 630
  • [7] Patient-centered psychiatric care for youth in foster care: a systematic and critical review
    Barnett, Erin R.
    Concepcion-Zayas, Milangel T.
    Zisman-Ilani, Yaara
    Bellonci, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC CHILD WELFARE, 2019, 13 (04) : 462 - 489
  • [8] Patient-Centered Health Care Delivery Systems in the US: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Bethge, Susanne
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2013, 13
  • [9] The importance of understanding patient and physician preferences for psoriasis treatment characteristics: a systematic review of discrete-choice experiments
    Sain, Noem
    Willems, Damon
    Charokopou, Mata
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2020, 36 (08) : 1257 - 1275
  • [10] Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review
    DosReis, Susan
    Pena, Dafne Espinal
    Fincannon, Alexandra
    Gorman, Emily F.
    Amill-Rosario, Alejandro
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2025, 18 (01) : 19 - 33