An approach to measuring business-IT alignment maturity via DoDAF2.0

被引:5
作者
Zhang Mengmeng [1 ]
Chen Honghui [1 ]
Mao Yi [2 ]
Luo Aiming [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Sci & Technol Informat Syst Engn Lab, Changsha 410072, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Air Traff Management Syst & Technol, Nanjing 210014, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
business-IT alignment (BITA); measurement; enterprise architecture (EA); DoD Architectural Framework 2.0 (DoDAF2.0); meta-model; STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT; TECHNOLOGY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.21629/JSEE.2020.01.11
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Measuring the business-IT alignment (BITA) of an organization determines its alignment level, provides directions for further improvements, and consequently promotes the organizational performances. Due to the capabilities of enterprise architecture (EA) in interrelating different business/IT viewpoints and elements, the development of EA is superior to support BITA measurement. Extant BITA measurement literature is sparse when it concerns EA. The literature tends to explain how EA viewpoints or models correlate with BITA, without discussing where to collect and integrate EA data. To address this gap, this paper attempts to propose a specific BITA measurement process through associating a BITA maturity model with a famous EA framework: DoD Architectural Framework 2.0 (DoDAF2.0). The BITA metrics in the maturity model are connected to the meta-models and models of DoDAF2.0. An illustrative ArchiSurance case is conducted to explain the measurement process. Systematically, this paper explores the process of BITA measurement from the viewpoint of EA, which helps to collect the measurement data in an organized way and analyzes the BITA level in the phase of architecture development.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 108
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, P 1 INT WORKSH REQ E
  • [2] [Anonymous], 41 HAW INT C SYST SC
  • [3] [Anonymous], ARXIV11041132
  • [4] [Anonymous], COMPETING INFORM AGE
  • [5] Architecture Working Group of the Software Engineering Committee, 2000, REC PRACT ARCH DESCR
  • [6] Using and validating the strategic alignment model
    Avison, D
    Jones, J
    Powell, P
    Wilson, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2004, 13 (03) : 223 - 246
  • [7] BIGGS B, 2005, IET DIGITAL LIB, V62, p311
  • [8] KEY ISSUES IN INFORMATION-SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT
    BRANCHEAU, JC
    WETHERBE, JC
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 1987, 11 (01) : 23 - 45
  • [9] CARVALHO G L, 2008, P 16 EUR C INF SYST, p2496
  • [10] CARVALHO R, BUSINESS INFORM SYST