Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography

被引:15
作者
Oda, S. [1 ]
Awai, K. [1 ]
Funama, Y. [2 ]
Utsunomiya, D. [1 ]
Yanaga, Y. [1 ]
Kawanaka, K. [1 ]
Nakaura, T. [1 ]
Hirai, T. [1 ]
Murakami, R. [1 ]
Nomori, H. [3 ]
Yamashita, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Grad Sch Med Sci, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Sch Hlth Sci, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[3] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Gen Thorac Surg, Tokyo 160, Japan
关键词
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; LUNG-CANCER; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; AMORPHOUS-SILICON; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2010.02.012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To investigate the effect of a double-exposure dual-energy subtraction (DES) technique on the diagnostic performance of radiologists detecting small pulmonary nodules on flat-panel detector (FPD) chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using FPD radiography 41 sets of chest radiographs were obtained from 26 patients with pulmonary nodules measuring <= 20 mm and from 15 normal participants. Each dataset included standard and corresponding DES images. There were six non-solid, 10 part-solid, and 10 solid nodules. The mean size of the 26 nodules was 15 +/- 4.8 mm. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the performance of the eight board-certified radiologists. RESULTS: For the eight radiologists, the mean value of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) without and with DES images was 0.62 +/- 0.05 and 0.68 +/- 0.05, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). For part-solid nodules, the difference of the mean AUC value was statistically significant (AUC = 0.61 +/- 0.07 versus 0.69 +/- 0.05; p < 0.01): for non-solid nodules it was not (AUC = 0.62 +/- 0.1 versus 0.61 +/- 0.09; p = 0.73), and for solid nodules it was not (AUC = 0.75 +/- 0.1 versus 0.78 +/- 0.08: p = 0.23). For nodules with overlapping bone shadows, the difference of the mean AUC value was statistically significant (p = 0.03), for nodules without overlapping, it was not (p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Use of a double-exposure DES technique at FPD chest radiography significantly improved the diagnostic performance of radiologists to detect small pulmonary nodules. (C) 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 615
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography
    Bacher, K
    Smeets, P
    De Hauwere, A
    Verstraete, K
    Thierens, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (04) : 923 - 929
  • [2] Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography
    Floyd, CE
    Warp, RJ
    Dobbins, JT
    Chotas, HG
    Baydush, AH
    Vargas-Voracek, R
    Ravin, CE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 683 - 688
  • [3] Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, X-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography:: Contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses
    Hamer, OW
    Völk, M
    Zorger, N
    Feuerbach, S
    Strotzer, M
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (04) : 212 - 220
  • [4] CT screening for lung cancer: Frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules
    Henschke, CI
    Yankelevitz, DF
    Mirtcheva, R
    McGuinness, G
    McCauley, D
    Miettinen, OS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (05) : 1053 - 1057
  • [5] Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography
    Ide K.
    Mogami H.
    Murakami T.
    Yasuhara Y.
    Miyagawa M.
    Mochizuki T.
    [J]. Radiation Medicine, 2007, 25 (5): : 195 - 201
  • [6] Peripheral lung cancer: Screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography
    Kaneko, M
    Eguchi, K
    Ohmatsu, H
    Kakinuma, R
    Naruke, T
    Suemasu, K
    Moriyama, N
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) : 798 - 802
  • [7] CONVENTIONAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY VS DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PULMONARY NODULES
    KELCZ, F
    ZINK, FE
    PEPPLER, WW
    KRUGER, DG
    ERGUN, DL
    MISTRETTA, CA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (02) : 271 - 278
  • [8] Metz CE, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1033, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980515)17:9<1033::AID-SIM784>3.3.CO
  • [9] 2-Q
  • [10] NOGUCHI M, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V75, P2844, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:12<2844::AID-CNCR2820751209>3.0.CO