Bypassing agent prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors

被引:16
作者
Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree [1 ]
Nevitt, Sarah J. [2 ]
Simpson, Mindy L. [3 ]
Janbain, Maissaa [4 ]
Konkle, Barbara A. [5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Biostat, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Sect Pediat Hematol Oncol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[5] Bloodworks North West, 921 Terry Ave, Seattle, WA USA
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2017年 / 09期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RECOMBINANT FACTOR VIIA; PROTHROMBIN COMPLEX CONCENTRATE; SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; CONTINUOUS-INFUSION; BLEEDING EPISODES; HOME TREATMENT; IX INHIBITORS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD011441.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background People with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors are at high risk of bleeding complications. Infusion of bypassing agents, such as recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) and plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate, are suggested as alternative therapies to factor VIII (haemophilia A) or IX (haemophilia B) for individuals who no longer respond to these treatments because they develop inhibitory antibodies. The ultimate goal of treatment is to preserve the individual's joints, otherwise destroyed by recurrent bleeds. Objectives To assess the effects of bypassing agent prophylaxis to prevent bleeding in people with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors. Search methods We searched for relevant studies from the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, comprising of references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched trial registries (16 February 2017) and bibliographic references of retrieved studies were reviewed for potential articles to be included in the review. Date of the last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Coagulopathies Trials Register: 12 December 2016. Selection criteria We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled studies (cross-over or parallel design) evaluating the effect of prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents compared with on-demand treatment, or studies evaluating the effects of high-dose compared with low-dose prophylaxis in males of any age with hemophilia with inhibitors. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias according to standard Cochrane criteria. They assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria. Main results We included four randomized studies (duration 7 to 15 months) involving 116 males. Risk of bias was judged to be high in two studies due to the open-label study design and in one study due to attrition bias. Two studies compared on-demand treatment to prophylaxis with bypassing agents. In one study (34 males) prophylaxis significantly reduced mean overall bleeding rates, MD - 7.27 (95% CI -9.92 to -4.62) (low quality evidence), mean number of overall bleeding events per month, MD -1.10 (95% CI -1.54 to -0.66), mean number of hemarthrosis, MD -6.60 (95% CI -9.32 to -3.88) (low quality evidence) and mean number of joints that had hemarthrosis, MD -0.90 (95% CI -1.36 to -0.44). The meta-analysis did not conclusively demonstrate significant benefit of prophylaxis on health-related quality of life as measured by Haem-A-QoL score, EQ-5D total score and utility score, EQ-5D VAS and SF-36 physical summary and mental summary score (low quality evidence for all health-related quality of life analyses). The remaining two studies compared dose regimens. The results from one study (22 males) did not conclusively demonstrate benefit or harm of high-dose versus low-dose recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) as a prophylaxis for overall bleeding rate, MD -0.82 (95% CI -2.27 to 0.63) (moderate quality evidence), target joint bleeding rate, MD -3.20 (95% CI -7.23 to 0.83) (moderate quality evidence) and serious adverse events, RR 9.00 (95% CI, 0.54 to 149.50) (moderate quality evidence). The overall quality of evidence was moderate to low due to imprecision from limited information provided by studies with small sample sizes and incomplete outcome data in one study. Authors' conclusions The evidence suggests that prophylaxis with bypassing agents may be effective in reducing bleeding in males with hemophilia with inhibitors. However, there is a lack of evidence for the superiority of one agent over the other or for the optimum dosage regimen. Further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits and harms of prophylaxis treatment on health-related quality of life, as well as the effects of dose of bypassing agents on the outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:49
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries
    Abba, Katharine
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Olliaro, Piero
    Naing, Cho-Min
    Jackson, Sally M.
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Donegan, Sarah
    Garner, Paul
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (07):
  • [2] Antunes S, 2013, J THROMB HAEMOST, V11, P982
  • [3] Randomized comparison of prophylaxis and on-demand regimens with FEIBA NF in the treatment of haemophilia A and B with inhibitors
    Antunes, S. V.
    Tangada, S.
    Stasyshyn, O.
    Mamonov, V.
    Phillips, J.
    Guzman-Becerra, N.
    Grigorian, A.
    Ewenstein, B.
    Wong, W. -Y.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2014, 20 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [4] Antunes SV, 2014, HAEMOPHILIA, V20, P96
  • [5] Non-genetic risk factors and the development of inhibitors in haemophilia: a comprehensive review and consensus report
    Astermark, J.
    Altisent, C.
    Batorova, A.
    Diniz, M. J.
    Gringeri, A.
    Holme, P. A.
    Karafoulidou, A.
    Lopez-Fernandez, M. F.
    Reipert, B. M.
    Rocino, A.
    Schiavoni, M.
    von Depka, M.
    Windyga, J.
    Fijnvandraat, K.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2010, 16 (05) : 747 - 766
  • [6] Inhibitor development: patient-determined risk factors
    Astermark, J.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2010, 16 : 66 - 70
  • [7] A randomized comparison of bypassing agents in hemophilia complicated by an inhibitor: the FEIBA NovoSeven Comparative (FENOC) Study
    Astermark, Jan
    Donfield, Sharyne M.
    DiMichele, Donna M.
    Gringeri, Alessandro
    Gilbert, Steven A.
    Waters, Jennifer
    Berntorp, Erik
    [J]. BLOOD, 2007, 109 (02) : 546 - 551
  • [8] GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
    Balshem, Howard
    Helfand, Mark
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Kunz, Regina
    Brozek, Jan
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Meerpohl, Joerg
    Norris, Susan
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 401 - 406
  • [9] Inhibitor treatment in haemophillas A and B: Summary statement for the 2006 International Consensus Conference
    Berntorp, E.
    Shapiro, A.
    Astermark, J.
    Blanchette, V. S.
    Collins, P. W.
    Dimichele, D.
    Escuriola, C.
    Hay, C. R. M.
    Hoots, W. K.
    Leissinger, C. A.
    Negrier, C.
    Oldenburg, J.
    Peerlinck, K.
    Reding, M. T.
    Hart, C.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2006, 12 : 1 - 7
  • [10] Chuansumrit A, 2000, HAEMOPHILIA, V6, P61