Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum Antibodies in Cattle in Veracruz, Mexico

被引:0
作者
Romero-Salas, D. [1 ]
Garcia-Vazquez, Z. [2 ]
Montiel-Palacios, F. [1 ]
Montiel-Pena, T. [1 ]
Aguilar-Dominguez, M. [1 ]
Medina-Esparza, L. [3 ]
Cruz-Vazquez, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Veracruzana, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, Veracruz 91710, Mexico
[2] INIFAP, Ctr Nacl Invest Disciplinaria Parasitol Vet, Jiutepec 6225, Morelos, Mexico
[3] Inst Tecnol El Llano, El Llano 20041, Aguascalientes, Mexico
来源
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES | 2010年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
Cattle; Neospora caninum; neosporosis; seroprevalence; Mexico; AVIUM SUBSPECIES PARATUBERCULOSIS; NATURALLY INFECTED BULLS; VIRAL-DIARRHEA VIRUS; DAIRY-CATTLE; BOVINE NEOSPOROSIS; BEEF-CATTLE; TOXOPLASMA-GONDII; DEFINITIVE HOSTS; WATER-BUFFALOS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of Neospora caninum antibodies in 863 female cattle 1 to >= 6 years old from 78 herds of dairy, beef and crossbred cattle in Veracruz, Mexico. Serum samples were tested for the presence of N. caninum antibodies using an ELISA assay. Overall seroprevalence of N. caninum antibodies was 26%. By municipality, the highest prevalence was 47.4% and the lowest 6% (p<0.05). By age, the highest prevalence was found in. 5 year olds (28%) and the lowest (11.1%) in 1 year olds (p<0.05). Regarding the breed, the highest seroprevalence was observed in crossbred females (p<0.05). Considering the reproductive status, the highest seroprevalence was in cows with >5 calvings (32.1%) and the lowest was in pubertal heifers (11.1%; p<0.05). Seroprevalence was 26.2% in homebred and 23% in purchased animals (p>0.05). Prevalence in females with a history of abortions was 40 and 26.2% in females with no records of previous abortions (p<0.05). The results show that bovine neosporosis is widespread in the State of Veracruz, Mexico, as in other regions of the country.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1451
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Aktas Munir, 2005, Turkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi, V29, P22
  • [2] Bae Ji-Seon, 2000, Korean Journal of Parasitology, V38, P245, DOI 10.3347/kjp.2000.38.4.245
  • [3] Supranational comparison of Neospora caninum seroprevalences in cattle in Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden
    Bartels, CJM
    Arnaiz-Seco, JI
    Ruiz-Santa-Quitera, A
    Björkman, C
    Frössling, J
    Blumröder, DY
    Conraths, FJ
    Schares, G
    van Maanen, C
    Wouda, W
    Ortega-Mora, LM
    [J]. VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2006, 137 (1-2) : 17 - 27
  • [4] Bergeron N, 2000, CAN VET J, V41, P464
  • [5] Bjorkman C, 1996, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V208, P1441
  • [6] Occasional detection of Neospora caninum DNA in frozen extended semen from naturally infected bulls
    Caetano-da-Silva, A
    Ferre, I
    Collantes-Fernández, E
    Navarro, V
    Aduriz, G
    Ugarte-Garagalza, C
    Ortega-Mora, LM
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 2004, 62 (07) : 1329 - 1336
  • [7] Application of repeated bulk milk testing for identification of infection dynamics of Neospora caninum in Thai dairy herds
    Chanlun, A
    Emanuelson, U
    Chanlun, S
    Alumlamai, S
    Björkman, C
    [J]. VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2006, 136 (3-4) : 243 - 250
  • [8] First report of Neospora caninum infection in adult alpacas (Vicugna pacos) and llamas (Lama glama)
    Chávez-Velásquez, A
    Alvarez-García, G
    Collantes-Fernández, E
    Casas-Astos, E
    Rosadio-Alcántara, R
    Serrano-Martínez, E
    Ortega-Mora, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 2004, 90 (04) : 864 - 866
  • [9] Isolation of Neospora caninum from a calf in Malaysia
    Cheah, TS
    Mattsson, JG
    Zaini, M
    Sani, RA
    Jakubek, EB
    Uggla, A
    Chandrawathani, P
    [J]. VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2004, 126 (03) : 263 - 269
  • [10] Management factors related to seroprevalences to bovine viral-diarrhoea virus, bovine-leukosis virus, Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, and Neospora caninum in dairy herds in the Canadian Maritimes
    Chi, JW
    VanLeeuwen, JA
    Weersink, A
    Keefe, GP
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (01) : 57 - 68