A target-based normalization technique for materials selection

被引:71
作者
Jahan, Ali [1 ]
Bahraminasab, Marjan [1 ]
Edwards, K. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Semnan Branch, Fac Engn, Semnan, Iran
[2] Aston Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
来源
MATERIALS & DESIGN | 2012年 / 35卷
关键词
Selection of materials; Weighting and ranking factors; Performance indices; DECISION-MAKING METHOD; COMPREHENSIVE VIKOR; COMPROMISE RANKING; ENGINEERING DESIGN; MECHANICAL DESIGN; SUBSTITUTION; COMPONENTS; EXTENSION; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.005
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Ranking and selection of the optimal material is an important stage in the engineering design process. However, most of the methods proposed for ranking in materials selection have tended to focus on cost and benefit criteria, with target values receiving much less attention in spite of their importance in many practical decision-making problems such as selecting materials to best match the properties of human tissue in biomedical engineering applications. In response to this perceived gap, the development of a new normalization technique is considered in this paper that provides an extension of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method and objective weighting in materials selection. There are four example cases included to validate the accuracy of outcomes from the proposed model. It is believed that the proposed decision-making model is suitable for linking to material databases and has the potential to enhance the efficiency of computer-aided materials selection systems. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 654
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Ashby M, 2010, STRUCTURE MAT SELECT, P122
  • [2] Selection strategies for materials and processes
    Ashby, MF
    Bréchet, YJM
    Cebon, D
    Salvo, L
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2004, 25 (01) : 51 - 67
  • [3] Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR
    Bahraminasab, Marjan
    Jahan, Ali
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2011, 32 (8-9) : 4471 - 4477
  • [4] Cather H, 2001, MAT SELECTION DESIGN, P190
  • [5] Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods
    Chatterjee, Prasenjit
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2011, 32 (02) : 851 - 860
  • [6] Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods
    Chatterjee, Prasenjit
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2009, 30 (10) : 4043 - 4053
  • [7] An extreme-distance approach to multiple criteria ranking
    Chen, Ye
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2011, 53 (5-6) : 646 - 658
  • [8] Chiner M., 1988, Materials and Design, V9, P195
  • [9] An integrated decision aid extension to material selection problem
    Cicek, Kadir
    Celik, Metin
    Topcu, Y. Ilker
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2010, 31 (09) : 4398 - 4402
  • [10] Multiple attribute decision-making solution to material selection problem based on modified fuzzy axiomatic design-model selection interface algorithm
    Cicek, Kadir
    Celik, Metin
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2010, 31 (04): : 2129 - 2133