COUPLED ANALYSIS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL ACOUSTIC AND MEMBRANE VIBRATION BY CONCENTRATED MASS MODEL

被引:0
作者
Satoshi, Ishikawa [1 ]
Shinya, Kijimoto [1 ]
Ataru, Matsuo [1 ]
Yuta, Akayama [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Nishi Ku, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Kawasaki Heavy Ind Co Ltd, Mat Handling Dept, Chuo Ku, 1-1 Higashikawasaki Cho 3 Chome, Kobe, Hyogo 6508670, Japan
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION: FROM ANCIENT TO MODERN ACOUSTICS | 2016年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
When using the finite element method (FEM) for a structural-acoustic coupled analysis, the mass and stiffness matrices are not symmetric because the acoustic space is described by sound pressure and the structure is described by displacement. Therefore, eigenvalue analysis takes a long time. In our previous studies, we have proposed a concentrated mass model for in performing structural-acoustic coupled analysis. The advantage of this model is that the mass and stiffness matrices become symmetric because both the acoustic space and the membrane are described by the displacement of the mass points. However, some physically meaningless modes, such as spurious modes and zero eigenvalues, arise with this model. In this paper, we propose a new concentrated mass model that does not generate the spurious modes and zero eigenvalues. This model can be used to analyze a coupled system of a two-dimensional acoustic space and a membrane. The mass points of the new model are placed at the sides of elements rather than at nodal points. To confirm the validity of the proposed model, the natural frequency obtained by using the concentrated mass model is compared with the natural frequency found by using FEM. These results are in good agreement, and spurious modes and zero eigenvalues are not generated in the proposed model. Furthermore, we compared the proposed model with FEM in terms of the time required for the eigenvalue analysis. Because the mass and stiffness matrices of the proposed model are symmetric, its eigenvalue analysis is faster than that of FEM, whose matrices are asymmetric. Therefore, we conclude that the proposed model is valid for coupled analysis of a two-dimensional acoustic space and membrane vibration, and that it is superior to FEM in terms of calculation time.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[2]   ACOUSTIC FINITE-ELEMENT APPROACH FOR STUDYING BOUNDARY FLEXIBILITY AND SOUND TRANSMISSION BETWEEN IRREGULAR ENCLOSURES [J].
CRAGGS, A .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1973, 30 (03) :343-357
[3]  
Everstine G.C., 1975, NASTRAN : Users Experiences, P419
[4]   A SYMMETRIC POTENTIAL FORMULATION FOR FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION [J].
EVERSTINE, GC .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1981, 79 (01) :157-160
[5]  
Ishikawa S., 2014, P INT 2014 MELB AUST
[6]   IMPROVED MODE-SUPERPOSITION TECHNIQUE FOR MODAL FREQUENCY-RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF COUPLED ACOUSTIC-STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS [J].
MA, ZD ;
HAGIWARA, I .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1991, 29 (10) :1720-1726
[7]   STRUCTURAL-ACOUSTIC FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE AUTOMOBILE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT - A REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE [J].
NEFSKE, DJ ;
WOLF, JA ;
HOWELL, LJ .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1982, 80 (02) :247-266
[8]   A NEW STRATEGY FOR SOLVING FLUID-STRUCTURE PROBLEMS [J].
SANDBERG, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1995, 38 (03) :357-370
[9]   ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC FIELD IN IRREGULARLY SHAPED ROOMS BY FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD [J].
SHUKU, T ;
ISHIHARA, K .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1973, 29 (01) :67-76