Validation and pilot assessment of Tanzania water supply resilience measures

被引:0
作者
Sweya, Lukuba N. [1 ,2 ]
Wilkinson, Suzanne [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Ardhi Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Management, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[3] Massey Univ, Sch Built Environm, Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED WATER ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH | 2022年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
Resilience; measurement variables; validation; water supply system; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; VALIDITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/23249676.2021.2017804
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Water supply systems (WSSs) face constant water contamination and breakdown risks during disasters. Several studies develop resilience metrics without validation processes to ascertain their suitability and applicability. The current study examines the validity of existing qualitative resilience tools developed through a pre-assessment of the variables, a three-round Delphi process, and tested in three cases for applicability and generality. Validation applied the tools development data through a six-stage assessment process: (1) Group opinions, (2) Convergency of opinions, (3) Reliability analysis, (4) Inter-items correlations, (5) Level of agreements, (6) Applicability and generality. The tool encompasses 47 indicators in technical, organisational, social, economic, and environmental dimensions. The variables show better content validity with strong group opinions, significant convergence of opinions, high reliability, adequate relationship pattern, and excellent agreement in about 98% of indicators. Besides, there is adequate applicability and generality, thus, the variables are considered valid for Tanzania WSSs and in other developing countries.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 321
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] A New Metric for Assessing Resilience of Water Distribution Networks
    Assad, Ahmed
    Moselhi, Osama
    Zayed, Tarek
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [2] Validating Resilience and Vulnerability Indices in the Context of Natural Disasters
    Bakkensen, Laura A.
    Fox-Lent, Cate
    Read, Laura K.
    Linkov, Igor
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (05) : 982 - 1004
  • [3] A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities
    Bruneau, M
    Chang, SE
    Eguchi, RT
    Lee, GC
    O'Rourke, TD
    Reinhorn, AM
    Shinozuka, M
    Tierney, K
    Wallace, WA
    von Winterfeldt, D
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) : 733 - 752
  • [5] Social vulnerability to environmental hazards
    Cutter, SL
    Boruff, BJ
    Shirley, WL
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 84 (02) : 242 - 261
  • [6] Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards
    Cutter, Susan L.
    Finch, Christina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (07) : 2301 - 2306
  • [7] A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability
    DeVon, Holli A.
    Block, Michelle E.
    Moyle-Wright, Patricia
    Ernst, Diane M.
    Hayden, Susan J.
    Lazzara, Deborah J.
    Savoy, Suzanne M.
    Kostas-Polston, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2007, 39 (02) : 155 - 164
  • [8] FLEISS JL, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P378, DOI 10.1037/h0031619
  • [9] Greatorex J, 2000, J ADV NURS, V32, P1016
  • [10] Hodliffe M., 2014, The development and validation of the employee resilience scale (EmpRes): The conceptualisation of a new model