Ecotoxicological risk and health risk characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in terrestrial soils of King George Island, Antarctica

被引:23
作者
Deelaman, Woranuch [1 ,2 ]
Pongpiachan, Siwatt [3 ]
Tipmanee, Danai [4 ]
Choochuay, Chomsri [1 ]
Suttinun, Oramas [1 ]
Charoenkalunyuta, Teetat [5 ]
Promdee, Kittiphop [6 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Environm Management, Hat Yai Campus, Hat Yai 90112, Thailand
[2] Rajamangala Univ Technol Phra Nakhon, Fac Sci & Technol, Div Environm Sci & Technol, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
[3] Natl Inst Dev Adm NIDA, Sch Social & Environm Dev, NIDA Ctr Res & Dev Disaster Prevent & Management, 118 Moo 3,Sereethai Rd, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
[4] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Technol & Environm, Phuket Campus 80 M1 Kathu, Phuket 83120, Thailand
[5] Chulalongkorn Univ, Dept Survey Engn, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[6] Chulachomklao Royal Mil Acad, Dept Environm Sci, Nakhon Nayok 26001, Thailand
关键词
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Terrestrial soil; King George Island; Ecological risk assessment; Incremental lifetime cancer risk; PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; CANCER-RISK; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; MOLECULAR MARKERS; MCMURDO STATION; EXPOSURE; SEDIMENTS; BAY; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.polar.2021.100715
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We studied the concentrations, characteristics, ecological risk, and health risk of 12 probably carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in KGI soils of Antarctica. Measured concentrations of 12 PAHs ranged from 1.83 to 32.9 ng g(-1) with an average of 11.9 +/- 8.13 ng g(-1). The assessment of ecological risks used methods that were based on total toxicity equivalency concentrations (TEQs) and a risk quotient (RQ), which can be used to sensitively and accurately assess Sigma PAHs. The results indicated that PAHs in the soils of KGI presented a low risk level to living organisms in the soil and to plants. The low molecular weight PAHs presented a much greater ecological risk than high molecular weight PAHs in KGI soils, and the levels of these ecological risks were classified as low compared to those of previous studies in other areas. The total values of incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) for children and adults were 2.34 x 10(-8) and 1.73 x 10(-8), respectively. Soil samples from KGI that were contaminated with PAHs still exhibited risks that were much lower than that of the baseline value. The results of this investigation provide a database for contamination evaluation, risk assessment of ecological and human health in PAH-contaminated sites.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Abdel-Shafy Hussein I., 2016, Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, V25, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011
[2]   Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in indoor air and dust samples of different Saudi microenvironments; health and carcinogenic risk assessment for the general population [J].
Ali, Nadeem .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 696
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum, V32, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CAN ENV QUAL GUID 19, P1
[5]   Lung cancer risk after exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review and meta-analysis [J].
Armstrong, B ;
Hutchinson, E ;
Unwin, J ;
Fletcher, T .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 112 (09) :970-978
[6]   Source apportionment of priority PAHs in 11 lake sediment cores from Songnen Plain, Northeast China [J].
Bao, Kunshan ;
Zaccone, Claudio ;
Tao, Yuqiang ;
Wang, Jian ;
Shen, Ji ;
Zhang, Yifeng .
WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 168
[7]  
Bhardwaj L, 2019, ASIAN J CHEM, V31, P1574
[8]   Persistent Organic Pollutants in Biotic and Abiotic Components of Antarctic Pristine Environment [J].
Bhardwaj L. ;
Chauhan A. ;
Ranjan A. ;
Jindal T. .
Earth Systems and Environment, 2018, 2 (1) :35-54
[9]  
BMEPRI, 2007, GUID SIT ENV ASS
[10]   Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air [J].
Boström, CE ;
Gerde, P ;
Hanberg, A ;
Jernström, B ;
Johansson, C ;
Kyrklund, T ;
Rannug, A ;
Törnqvist, M ;
Victorin, K ;
Westerholm, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 110 :451-488